On Tuesday 26 August 2014 18:25:00 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 17:49, Peter Humphrey wrote:
So all this has been for nothing. I was sure I'd set 1.x metadata when
creating the md device, but I must eat humble pie and glare once again at
my own memory.
Not to worry. However, I still
On Monday 25 August 2014 18:46:23 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
I now wonder if this is a race condition between the init script running
`mdadm -As` and the fact that the mdadm package installs udev rules
On 26/08/2014 10:38, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 18:46:23 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
I now wonder if this is a race condition between the init script running
`mdadm -As` and the fact
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 14:21:19 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 10:38, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 18:46:23 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
---8
Again, can you find out what the
On 26/08/2014 15:54, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 14:21:19 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 10:38, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 18:46:23 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 17:00:37 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 15:54, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 14:21:19 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 10:38, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 18:46:23 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey
On 26/08/2014 17:49, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 17:00:37 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 15:54, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 14:21:19 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 26/08/2014 10:38, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 18:46:23 Kerin Millar wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2014 19:22:40 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
---8
So I decided to clean up /etc/mdadm.conf by adding these lines:
DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb*
ARRAY /dev/md5 devices=/dev/sda5,/dev/sdb5
ARRAY /dev/md7 devices=/dev/sda7,/dev/sdb7
ARRAY
On Monday 25 August 2014 10:22:31 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2014 19:22:40 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
---8
So I decided to clean up /etc/mdadm.conf by adding these lines:
DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb*
ARRAY /dev/md5
On 25/08/2014 10:22, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2014 19:22:40 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
---8
So I decided to clean up /etc/mdadm.conf by adding these lines:
DEVICE /dev/sda* /dev/sdb*
ARRAY /dev/md5 devices=/dev/sda5,/dev/sdb5
ARRAY
On 25/08/2014 13:18, Kerin Millar wrote:
snip
No, I get the same result. Just a red asterisk at the left end of the
line
after Starting up RAID devices...
It since dawned upon me that defining AUTO as such won't help because
you define the arrays explicitly. Can you try again with the
On 25/08/2014 12:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
snip
Well, it was simple. I just said rc-update del mdraid boot and all is now
well. I'd better revisit the docs to see if they still give the same advice.
-- Regards Peter
Very interesting indeed. I now wonder if this is a race condition
between
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 12:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
snip
Well, it was simple. I just said rc-update del mdraid boot and all is
now
well. I'd better revisit the docs to see if they still give the same
advice.
Very interesting indeed.
On 25/08/2014 17:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2014 13:35:11 Kerin Millar wrote:
On 25/08/2014 12:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
snip
Well, it was simple. I just said rc-update del mdraid boot and all is
now
well. I'd better revisit the docs to see if they still give the same
Hello list,
For several years I've been running with / on /dev/md5 (0.99 metadata), which
is built on /dev/sd[ab]5. At each boot I see a message scroll by saying
something like No devices found in config file or automatically and then lvm
continues to assemble md5 anyway and mount its file
On Sunday 24 Aug 2014 14:51:23 Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
For several years I've been running with / on /dev/md5 (0.99 metadata),
which is built on /dev/sd[ab]5. At each boot I see a message scroll by
saying something like No devices found in config file or automatically
and then lvm
On 24/08/2014 14:51, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
For several years I've been running with / on /dev/md5 (0.99 metadata), which
is built on /dev/sd[ab]5. At each boot I see a message scroll by saying
something like No devices found in config file or automatically and then lvm
LVM does
17 matches
Mail list logo
