---BeginMessage---
can anyone explain to me what are the differences between the stage 1,2
and 3 installation tarballs?
:/
thx...
---End Message---
On Monday 16 April 2007, Jesús Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Stage tarballs':
El Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:54:49 +0300
Stratos Psomadakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
can anyone explain to me what are the differences between the stage
1,2 and 3 installation tarballs?ç
installing with stage3 and 2x emerge -e system and 2x emerge -e world will
give you exact performance as it was installed from stage1..
On 4/16/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 16 April 2007, Jesús Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
'Re:
[gentoo-user] Stage
On Monday 16 April 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
IIRC, I started from stage 1 on my first install (2004.3), but I
wouldn't recommend anything other than stage 3 to anyone at this
point, since there's now an established procedure for changing your
CHOST if need be, and packages in system
El Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:56:27 +0200
purple [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
installing with stage3 and 2x emerge -e system and 2x emerge -e world
will give you exact performance as it was installed from stage1..
Nah, doing an emerge -e world will give you exactly the same. Since the
gcc compiler
El Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:02:39 +0200
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Monday 16 April 2007, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
IIRC, I started from stage 1 on my first install (2004.3), but I
wouldn't recommend anything other than stage 3 to anyone at this
point, since there's now an
On Monday 16 April 2007, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
So, besides wasting your time, there is no point (even for learning
purposes) on doing a stage1 install. If you want to learn something
about the build process of a linux distro go and use linux from
scratch. The snippet above (actually 3
7 matches
Mail list logo