On Tuesday 05 July 2011 00:18:48 Roman Zilka did opine thusly:
> > I think this is the root cause of your questions. You say
> > "portage has no way to know the difference" - who says that is
> > true? Did you assume it?
>
> It sure is possible. I assumed what I did because the ebuild of a
> virt
Roman Zilka (Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:36:21 +0200):
> Henry Gebhardt (Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:21:22 +0200):
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:59:23PM +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> > > Roman Zilka (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:34:01 +0200):
> > > > Neil Bothwick (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:16:18 +0100):
> > > > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011
Henry Gebhardt (Tue, 5 Jul 2011 00:21:22 +0200):
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:59:23PM +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> > Roman Zilka (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:34:01 +0200):
> > > Neil Bothwick (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:16:18 +0100):
> > > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:48:44 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > No
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 11:59:23PM +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> Roman Zilka (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:34:01 +0200):
> > Neil Bothwick (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:16:18 +0100):
> > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:48:44 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> > >
> > > > Not quite. This is how I'm thinking: if '-ep world' says virtua
> > Not quite. This is how I'm thinking: if '-ep world' says virtual/pam
> > needs to be installed, then it either
> > * is in the world file, or
> > * is in the system set, or
> > * is a buildtime or runtime dependency (immediate or deep) of one of
> > the packages in the world set (i.e., world fi
Roman Zilka (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 23:34:01 +0200):
> Neil Bothwick (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:16:18 +0100):
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:48:44 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> >
> > > Not quite. This is how I'm thinking: if '-ep world' says virtual/pam
> > > needs to be installed, then it either
> > > * is in the wor
Neil Bothwick (Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:16:18 +0100):
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:48:44 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
>
> > Not quite. This is how I'm thinking: if '-ep world' says virtual/pam
> > needs to be installed, then it either
> > * is in the world file, or
> > * is in the system set, or
> > * is a bui
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:48:44 +0200, Roman Zilka wrote:
> Not quite. This is how I'm thinking: if '-ep world' says virtual/pam
> needs to be installed, then it either
> * is in the world file, or
> * is in the system set, or
> * is a buildtime or runtime dependency (immediate or deep) of one of the
On Monday 04 July 2011 22:48:44 Roman Zilka did opine thusly:
> Alan McKinnon (Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:24:54 +0200):
> > On Monday 04 July 2011 14:47:47 Roman Zilka did opine thusly:
> > > Hi once again,
> > >
> > > am I missing something or are these bugs? If bugs, do you
> > > think I should file th
Alan McKinnon (Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:24:54 +0200):
> On Monday 04 July 2011 14:47:47 Roman Zilka did opine thusly:
> > Hi once again,
> >
> > am I missing something or are these bugs? If bugs, do you think I
> > should file them through bugzilla?
> >
> >
> > %%%
On Monday 04 July 2011 14:47:47 Roman Zilka did opine thusly:
> Hi once again,
>
> am I missing something or are these bugs? If bugs, do you think I
> should file them through bugzilla?
>
>
>
>
>
> # emerge -uDN --with-bdeps y world
Hi once again,
am I missing something or are these bugs? If bugs, do you think I
should file them through bugzilla?
# emerge -uDN --with-bdeps y world
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Auto-cleaning packages...
>>> No outdated p
12 matches
Mail list logo
