On Sunday 12 May 2013 03:37:48 Nick Khamis wrote:
Thanks yet again Michael! Enjoy your weekend.
N.
On 5/11/13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 03:13 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
through
You can read a comparison between the *Swans here, but things have moved on
since; e.g. StrongSwan supports IKEv1 in Aggressive Mode,
Aggressive mode with pre-shared keys is vulnerable to offline dictionary
attack so you might as well use main mode. If for some reason you have to
use
On Monday 13 May 2013 03:13:27 Adam Carter wrote:
You can read a comparison between the *Swans here, but things have moved
on since; e.g. StrongSwan supports IKEv1 in Aggressive Mode,
Aggressive mode with pre-shared keys is vulnerable to offline dictionary
attack so you might as well use
Hello Everyone,
Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of research, I found that this
is achieved using a system with IPSec kernel modules enabled, along
with cryptography modules. On the application level, I saw ipsec tool,
On 05/11/2013 03:13 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of research, I found that this
is achieved using a system with IPSec kernel modules enabled, along
with cryptography modules. On
Thanks yet again Michael! Enjoy your weekend.
N.
On 5/11/13, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/11/2013 03:13 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of research, I found that this
6 matches
Mail list logo
