> On 31 Aug 2016, at 16:25, Grant wrote:
>
>> Yes, FAT. It works and works well.
>> Or exFAT which is Microsoft's solution to the problem of very large
>> files on FAT.
>
> FAT32 won't work for me since I need to use files larger than 4GB. I
> know it's beta software but
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:32:19 -0700, Grant wrote:
> If I use ext2 on the USB stick, can I mount and use it as any user on
> any Gentoo system from within a file manager like thunar?
No, because ext2 uses proper Linux file permissions.
> Should I consider ext3/4 with journaling disabled?
That's
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:12:12 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> OP is looking for an fs to put on a memory stick that will work
> >> everywhere:
> >>
> >> - vfat
> >> - exfat
> >
> > He asked for something that would work "across Gentoo systems".
> >
> >
>
> How does exfat not fulfil that?
It
Am 30.08.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Grant:
ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the
first
> place.
My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that
includes
NTFS), not against your advice ;)
>>> OP is looking for
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Grant wrote:
>>
>> ext2 is on every system, exfat not. ext2 is very stable, tested and well
>> aged. exfat is some fuse something crap. New, hardly tested and unstable
>> as it gets.
>>
>
> If I use ext2 on the USB stick, can I mount and use
>>> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the
>>> first
place.
>>> My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that
>>> includes
>>> NTFS), not against your advice ;)
>>>
>>
>> OP is looking for an fs to put on a memory stick that will
Am 30.08.2016 um 21:14 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> On August 30, 2016 8:58:17 PM GMT+02:00, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>> Am 30.08.2016 um 20:12 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>>> On 30/08/2016 14:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:08:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Grant wrote:
> I decided to copy a 10GB file from a USB hard disk directly to the USB
> stick this morning and I ran into errors so I canceled the operation
> and now the file manager (thunar) has been stuck for well over an hour
> and I'm
On August 30, 2016 8:58:17 PM GMT+02:00, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
>Am 30.08.2016 um 20:12 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>> On 30/08/2016 14:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:08:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>>
>> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's
Am 30.08.2016 um 20:12 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On 30/08/2016 14:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:08:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the first
> place.
My point was against all the journalised
On 30/08/2016 14:04, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:08:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the first
place.
My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that includes
NTFS), not against your advice ;)
OP is
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Azamat Hackimov
wrote:
>
> I would recommend to use F2FS filesystem, since you have only Linux systems.
>
As a user of immature filesystems, I would not recommend F2FS unless
you want to be a user of immature filesystems. Remember how
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:08:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the first
> >> place.
> >
> > My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that includes
> > NTFS), not against your advice ;)
> >
>
>
> OP is looking for an fs
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:43:13 +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> On Tue Aug 30 10:40:01 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the first
> > place.
>
> My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that includes
> NTFS), not against your
On 30/08/2016 11:43, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> On Tue Aug 30 10:40:01 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the first place.
>
> My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that includes
> NTFS), not against your advice ;)
>
OP is
On Tue Aug 30 10:40:01 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> ext2 doesn't have a journal, that's why I suggested it in the first place.
My point was against all the journalised filesystems (that includes
NTFS), not against your advice ;)
--
alarig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:29:00 +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > So I'm done with NTFS forever. Will ext2 somehow allow me to use the
> > USB stick across Gentoo systems without permission/ownership
> > problems?
>
> I always use pmount for USB and other flash devices to have it
> mounted with my
On Mon Aug 29 17:51:19 2016, Grant wrote:
> So I'm done with NTFS forever. Will ext2 somehow allow me to use the
> USB stick across Gentoo systems without permission/ownership problems?
I always use pmount for USB and other flash devices to have it
mounted with my user permissions at all times.
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 17:51:19 -0700, Grant wrote:
> # ddrescue -d -r3 /dev/sdb usb.img usb.log
> [...]
> Ah, I got it, I just needed to specify the offset when mounting.
Tht's because you ran ddrescue on the whole stick and not the partition
containing the filesystem.
> Thank you so much
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 06:46:54 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > So I'm done with NTFS forever. Will ext2 somehow allow me to use the
> > USB stick across Gentoo systems without permission/ownership problems?
> >
> > - Grant
>
> ext2 will work, but you'll have to mount it or chmod -R 0777, or only
> root
On Monday 29 Aug 2016 17:51:19 Grant wrote:
> > I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
> > elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
> > the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that
> >>>
> >>>NTFS
> >>>
>
2016-08-30 5:51 GMT+05:00 Grant :
> Ah, I got it, I just needed to specify the offset when mounting.
> Thank you so much everyone. Many hours of work went into the file I
> just recovered.
>
> So I'm done with NTFS forever. Will ext2 somehow allow me to use the
> USB stick
> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that
>>>NTFS
> was the best solution.
>
> I decided to copy a 10GB
I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that
>>NTFS
was the best solution.
I decided to copy a 10GB file from
On August 29, 2016 3:24:18 AM GMT+02:00, Grant wrote:
>>> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
>>> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
>>> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that
>NTFS
>> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
>> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
>> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS
>> was the best solution.
>>
>> I decided to copy a 10GB file from a USB hard
On Sunday 28 Aug 2016 11:49:44 Grant wrote:
> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS
> was the best solution.
>
> I decided
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:49:44 -0700, Grant wrote:
> I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
> elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
> the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS
> was the best solution.
If it's
I have a USB stick with a crucial file on it (and only an old backup
elsewhere). It's formatted NTFS because I wanted to be able to open
the file on various Gentoo systems and my research indicated that NTFS
was the best solution.
I decided to copy a 10GB file from a USB hard disk directly to
29 matches
Mail list logo