Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via
the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for
thinkpad
there
Dnia 2010-04-26, pon o godzinie 19:10 -0700, Grant pisze:
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
there is extra one in
Dnia 2010-04-27, wto o godzinie 10:37 -0700, Grant pisze:
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
there is extra one in thinkpad
Dnia 2010-04-23, pią o godzinie 09:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for
Dnia 2010-04-22, czw o godzinie 09:47 -0700, Grant pisze:
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
there is extra one in thinkpad specific
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:51:19AM -0700, Grant wrote:
And (its only my private opinion - could base on wrong facts :P) dont be
used to hal because the 1.8 xorg-server dont like it any more,
preferring udev, and future versions wouldn't probably support hal at
all.
Lately i delete hal
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
probably stick with hal until 1.8.
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
probably stick with hal until 1.8.
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
directory
(EE) intel(0): Failed to become
On Thursday 22 April 2010 17:47:23 Grant wrote:
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think so)
You only
On 21 April 2010 12:26, Adam a...@jaftan.com.au wrote:
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think so)
You only
On 4/21/2010 3:07 PM, Grant wrote:
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
directory
(EE) intel(0): Failed to become
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got bad
performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Grant wrote:
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
- Grant
I
Dnia 2010-04-19, pon o godzinie 20:24 -0500, deface pisze:
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think so)
Exactly.
Dnia 2010-04-20, wto o godzinie 11:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
in order to fix it? Do I need to disable or enable DRI?
- Grant
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Grant wrote:
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
in
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
- Grant
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything
28 matches
Mail list logo
