On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:49:32 +0100
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a need for either nptl or nptlonly in our USE flags now that we have
> moved over to glibc-2.4 (assuming that we do not want linuxthreads anymore)?
> I currently have nptlonly in my make.conf and was wondering whether
On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:14, Jure Varlec wrote:
> Well, the new glibc-2.4 only supports nptl, unlike glibc-2.3 which
> supported both threading models. So if you want legacy linuxthreads, you
> have to stay with glibc-2.3.
> As for being "better", glibc-2.4 is better than 2.3 IMHO.
> Also,
On Friday 15 September 2006 07:07, Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
> Hi,
> For my new gentoo system I switched to the latest & greatest profile -
> 2006.1. During the initial installation emerge told me "glibc 2.4 is
> nptlonly" - so I turned on the nptl and nptlonly USE flags in make.conf.
> Now my old li
Hi,
For my new gentoo system I switched to the latest & greatest profile -
2006.1. During the initial installation emerge told me "glibc 2.4 is
nptlonly" - so I turned on the nptl and nptlonly USE flags in make.conf.
Now my old linux system (profile 2006.0) tells me the same.
Sooo - i guess I would
4 matches
Mail list logo
