Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?

2006-03-23 Thread hawat . thufir
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote: From: Jochen Schalanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?

2006-03-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:06:59 + (GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Determining the location of the kernel source code * Found kernel source directory: * /usr/src/linux * Could not find a usable .config in the kernel source directory. * Please ensure that /usr/src/linux points

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?

2006-03-23 Thread Holly Bostick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef: Very informative, thanks. I think I'll go with submount. These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N] sys-fs/submount-0.9-r2 159 kB Total size of downloads: 159 kB localhost ~ # emerge submount

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo?

2006-03-23 Thread hawat . thufir
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote: From: Jochen Schalanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount, submount... which is best for Gentoo? Newsgroups: linux.gentoo.user On 10/13/2004 11:10 PM, Felix Tiede wrote: submount is supposed to supersede