On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount,
submount... which is best for Gentoo?
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote:
From: Jochen Schalanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:06:59 + (GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Determining the location of the kernel source code
* Found kernel source directory:
* /usr/src/linux
* Could not find a usable .config in the kernel source directory.
* Please ensure that /usr/src/linux points
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Very informative, thanks. I think I'll go with submount.
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild N]
sys-fs/submount-0.9-r2 159 kB
Total size of downloads: 159 kB localhost ~ # emerge submount
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Jochen Schalanda wrote:
From: Jochen Schalanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] autofs, supermount,
submount... which is best for Gentoo?
Newsgroups: linux.gentoo.user
On 10/13/2004 11:10 PM, Felix Tiede wrote:
submount is supposed to supersede
4 matches
Mail list logo