On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:39:55 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That way
the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output until I
decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft from various
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:29:01 +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
Incidentally, I almost always install software with --oneshot. That
way the programs I install to try out show up on --depclean's output
until I decide I want to keep them. It prevents accumulating cruft
from various experiments,
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:28:26 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
Nothing as clever as that. I simply
echo cat/pkg /etc/portage/sets/temp
and have @temp in /var/lib/portage/world_sets
Each week I look at the set and decide what should be removed or
transferred to world.
That
090425 fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
My world file is 5794 lines long.
Well, it's true there are 13 465 pkgs in Gentoo (as of yesterday),
but I have only 538 installed only 65 in 'world'.
Yes, I use '-1' frequently ... (grin)
--
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:39:52 -0700, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
I am probably in that very situation. My world file is 5794 lines
long. I didn't know about -1 and frankly don't understand it. If I
remerge a package which is not in world, why is it added to world? I
had seen a few vague
On Sunday 26 April 2009 05:39:52 fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:27:08PM -0500, Dale wrote:
And from experience, I can tell you it happens when you don't use that
-1 option when you should. You can end up with a HUGE world file when
not using that opton to just rebuild
on Saturday 04/25/2009 Alan McKinnon(alan.mckin...@gmail.com) wrote
On Saturday 25 April 2009 20:52:28 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
app-text/poppler-bindings and app-text/poppler aren't needed by anything
right now.
So, I just unmerged them and
On Sunday 26 April 2009 08:40:39 John covici wrote:
OK, so this brings up the question, how do I make sure (if there is a
way to do so) that my world file does not contain anything which it
should not -- I am sure I have made the mistake of forgetting to put
the -1, so it would be interesting
Alan McKinnon wrote:
It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I
haven't found one, and prefer the manual approach above.
I know you can use eix-test-obsolete to find
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [26.04.09 18:49]:
It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I
haven't found one, and prefer the manual approach above.
#!/bin/bash
for
Sebastian Günther schrieb am 26.04.2009 19:55:
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [26.04.09 18:49]:
It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but
I
haven't found one, and
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
I know you can use eix-test-obsolete to find outdated/unneeded thing in
/etc/portage but I wish it would also do something similiar for the
world file. I just wonder if the person that wrote eix and friends
could add that in as a feature? It would be neat.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but I
haven't found one, and prefer the manual approach
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
It should be easy enough to write a program that examines world and displays
all packages it finds that are dependencies of something else in world, but
I
haven't found one,
I'm trying to understand the explanation of this but I don't quite see it. It
looks like conflicting libraries used by gimp, inkscape and openoffice.
I don't quite understand the explanation, and what my options are.
Translation appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
msoul...@anton:~$ emerge --pretend
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I'm trying to understand the explanation of this but I don't quite see it. It
looks like conflicting libraries used by gimp, inkscape and openoffice.
I don't quite understand the explanation, and what my options are.
Translation appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:30 +0200, Justin wrote:
('ebuild', '/', 'app-text/poppler-bindings-0.10.5-r1', 'merge')
pulled in by app-text/poppler-bindings required by world
Explanation:
New USE for 'app-text/poppler-bindings:0' are incorrectly set. In
order to solve
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:48:51 +0100
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
And remove poppler-bindings from world.
And note that =sys-apps/portage-2.2 will resolve that automagically
- without user (your) intervention.
--
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 26/04/09 Mike Kazantsev said:
And note that =sys-apps/portage-2.2 will resolve that automagically
- without user (your) intervention.
sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.7
Will that go stable soon?
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and
On 25/04/09 Justin said:
It tells you what todo:
emerge app-text/poppler-bindings-0.10.4
with USE=gtk cairo
check that if it solves the problem
msoul...@anton:~$ USE=gtk cairo sudo emerge --pretend
app-text/poppler-bindings
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
On 25/04/09 Neil Bothwick said:
And remove poppler-bindings from world.
Ok, and will prevent it from being considered during my next world update, as
I understand it. Can you explain why that's a good thing?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca
Any intelligent fool can
On Saturday 25 April 2009 20:17:52 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 25/04/09 Neil Bothwick said:
And remove poppler-bindings from world.
Ok, and will prevent it from being considered during my next world update,
as I understand it. Can you explain why that's a good thing?
No, it just takes it
On 25/04/09 Justin said:
It tells you what todo:
emerge app-text/poppler-bindings-0.10.4
with USE=gtk cairo
check that if it solves the problem
Ok, I rebuilt app-text/poppler-bindings with USE=gtk cairo, and I removed
app-text/poppler-bindings from world.
Now I get this
On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
So, luatex and xpdf require poppler 0.10.4, but app-text/poppler-0.10.5-r1 is
already installed. I guess xpdf and luatex can't handle the newer poppler
version for some reason? It's actually trying to downgrade poppler and
poppler-bindings for some reason.
On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
app-text/poppler-bindings and app-text/poppler aren't needed by anything right
now.
So, I just unmerged them and now my upgrade path looks good.
I'm not sure what pulled in those newer versions previously.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier
On Saturday 25 April 2009 20:52:28 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 25/04/09 Michael P. Soulier said:
app-text/poppler-bindings and app-text/poppler aren't needed by anything
right now.
So, I just unmerged them and now my upgrade path looks good.
I'm not sure what pulled in those newer
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:14:23 -0400
Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote:
On 26/04/09 Mike Kazantsev said:
And note that =sys-apps/portage-2.2 will resolve that automagically
- without user (your) intervention.
sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.7
Will that go stable soon?
I've yet
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Incidentally, poppler has a long and fine history of insanely breaking users'
configs every time its developers sneeze. The number of times I've had
poppler
show up in revdep-rebuild output defies any kind of sane, logical, rational
description. Not even Microsoft
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:52:28 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I'm not sure what pulled in those newer versions previously.
You had both poppler and poppler-bindings in world. What you saw was one
of the effects of a world file polluted by packages that should only ever
be installed as
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:52:28 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I'm not sure what pulled in those newer versions previously.
You had both poppler and poppler-bindings in world. What you saw was one
of the effects of a world file polluted by packages that should
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:27:08PM -0500, Dale wrote:
And from experience, I can tell you it happens when you don't use that
-1 option when you should. You can end up with a HUGE world file when
not using that opton to just rebuild something for some reason or other.
I am probably in that
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:39:52 -0700
fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
I am probably in that very situation. My world file is 5794 lines
long. I didn't know about -1 and frankly don't understand it. If I
remerge a package which is not in world, why is it added to world? I
had seen a few vague
32 matches
Mail list logo
