J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2016 05:07:03 PM Константин wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> Maybe you need to use
On Sunday, November 20, 2016 05:07:03 PM Константин wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> > > > Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But,
On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 17:07:03 Константин wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> > > > Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> > > Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
> > > 'eclean-dist -dp' first.
> >
> > BTW what
On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> > Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
> > 'eclean-dist -dp' first.
>
> BTW what troubles can I get from 'eclean-dist -d' ? As far as I
> understand it,
Sometimes the guy use cuda (1Gb installpackage) and don't have a very
fast internet connection. Who knows?
Regards
On 11/20/2016 10:05 AM, Константин wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016, at 14:05, Константин wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
>
> > Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
> > 'eclean-dist -dp' first.
>
> BTW what troubles can I get from 'eclean-dist -d' ? As far as I
> understand
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
> Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
> 'eclean-dist -dp' first.
BTW what troubles can I get from 'eclean-dist -d' ? As far as I
understand it, re-download needed tar.gz will be the worst isn't it?
#kstn
Mick wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following an update I just ran:
>
> # /usr/bin/eclean-dist
> * Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
> * Your distfiles directory was already clean.
>
> However, looking at source files of firefox as an example I see there are
> obsolete sources to be gotten rid
man eclean
Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
'eclean-dist -dp' first.
Regards
On 11/20/2016 08:55 AM, Mick wrote:
Hi All,
Following an update I just ran:
# /usr/bin/eclean-dist
* Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
* Your distfiles directory
Hi All,
Following an update I just ran:
# /usr/bin/eclean-dist
* Building file list for distfiles cleaning...
* Your distfiles directory was already clean.
However, looking at source files of firefox as an example I see there are
obsolete sources to be gotten rid of:
ls -la
11 matches
Mail list logo