Re: [gentoo-user] gawk and filefuncs

2010-09-04 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:25:32 +0200 Al oss.el...@googlemail.com wrote: Thank you very much. That is the best explanation a read to this. It should be deliverd with the sources. Still the procedure is unusual. They could apply a patch to extensions/ filefuncs.c and exclude it for vanilla.

Re: [gentoo-user] gawk and filefuncs

2010-09-04 Thread Al
You say it is mandatory on a Gentoo system, because there are awk scripts that rely on. Do this functions break because of the missing kernel? What would be the workaround? How are you building it? It needs special commands because it needs to become a shared object, not an executable.

[gentoo-user] gawk and filefuncs

2010-09-03 Thread Al
Can anybody explain the Gentoo handling of filefuncs in the gawk package? Why isn't a simple patch used like in all other cases? Al

Re: [gentoo-user] gawk and filefuncs

2010-09-03 Thread Etaoin Shrdlu
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22:31:01 +0200 Al oss.el...@googlemail.com wrote: Can anybody explain the Gentoo handling of filefuncs in the gawk package? Why isn't a simple patch used like in all other cases? gawk provides dynamic extension modules. This is explained here:

Re: [gentoo-user] gawk and filefuncs

2010-09-03 Thread Al
The gawk source distribution comes with a number of such extensions in the (doh) extensions/ directory. filefuncs.c is such one extension, which demonstrate how to add stat() and chdir() capabilities to awk. The file is compiled into a .so file, which is then referenced from within gawk to

Re: [gentoo-user] gawk and filefuncs

2010-09-03 Thread Al
I have a second issue. When compiling gawk on Cygwin, where is no windows kernel, the Gentoo version of filefuncs breaks. I have to Sure there is a windows kernel. The linux kernel is missing. Al