Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - emere -e world necessary?

2006-05-05 Thread Graham Murray
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild. Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild. But not because of a glibc update. That is not always true. A glibc upgrade *can* require that *some* packages are re-built. I am not an expert on

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - emere -e world necessary?

2006-05-05 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Friday 05 May 2006 08:12, Graham Murray wrote: Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild. Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild. But not because of a glibc update. That is not always true. A glibc upgrade *can* require

[gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - emere -e world necessary?

2006-05-04 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello! I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc 2.4, is it required to have a full emerge -e world run; ie. rebuild the entire system? Thanks, Alexander Skwar -- NATHAN ... your PARENTS were in a CARCRASH!! They're VOIDED -- They COLLAPSED They had no

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc 2.4 - emere -e world necessary?

2006-05-04 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:25, Alexander Skwar wrote: Hello! I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc 2.4, is it required to have a full emerge -e world run; ie. rebuild the entire system? no. glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild. Only if you change from gcc