On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a situation
that I have to encrypt my hard drive. I keep /, /boot, and swap outside
LVM, everything else is under LVM. I think all
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a situation
that I have to encrypt my hard drive. I keep /, /boot, and swap outside
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a
Am 13.03.2012 17:26, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:49:40 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Besides, I've already lost a poorly cooled HDD on a benchmark.
Better than losing it on real data.
--
Neil Bothwick
Why do they call it a TV set when you only get one?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 17:26, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind
of overhead should I expect?
What do you mean with overhead? CPU utilization? In that case the
overhead is minimal, especially when you run a 64-bit
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind
of overhead should I expect?
What do you mean with overhead? CPU utilization? In that case the
overhead
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind
of overhead should I expect?
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586
version is better for you --- unless GCC suddenly got a lot better at
optimizing code.
Since when, exactly? GCC isn't the best compiler at optimization, but
I fully expect current versions to produce better code for
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100,
Am 13.03.2012 19:58, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am
Am 13.03.2012 20:13, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586
version is better for you --- unless GCC suddenly got a lot better at
optimizing code.
Since when, exactly? GCC isn't the best compiler at
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 20:13, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp
Am 13.03.2012 20:07, schrieb Stroller:
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586 version is better for you --- unless GCC
suddenly got a lot better at optimizing code.
Since when, exactly? GCC isn't the best compiler at optimization,
but I fully expect
Am 13.03.2012 20:38, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586 version is better for you --- unless GCC
suddenly got a lot better at optimizing code.
Since
This thread is becoming ridiculously long. Just as a last side-note:
One of the primary reasons that the IA64 architecture failed was that it
relied on the compiler to optimize the code in order to exploit the
massive instruction-level parallelism the CPU offered. Compilers never
became
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:58:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
From what I can see in the kernel sources, there is a generic AES
implementation using nothing but portable C code and then there is
aes-i586 assembler code with aes_glue C code.
So I assume the i586
version is better
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a situation
that I have to encrypt my hard drive. I keep /, /boot, and swap outside
LVM, everything else is under LVM. I think all I need to do is to
encrypt /home which is under LVM. I use reiserfs.
I would appreciate suggestion
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a situation
that I have to encrypt my hard drive. I keep /, /boot, and swap outside
LVM, everything else is under LVM. I think all I need to do is to
encrypt /home which is
22 matches
Mail list logo