Re: [gentoo-user] iwl4965 performance

2008-03-26 Thread José Pedro Saraiva
Hi, Have you tried using the driver from the 2.6.24* series kernel? I've been using iwl3945 from tuxonice-sources 2.6.24-r3 without any performance or stability problems whatsoever. Good luck. Regards, José Pedro On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Kahle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] iwl4965 performance

2008-03-26 Thread Florian Philipp
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 17:28 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am using the iwl4965 driver which is included in the kernel 2.6.25-rc6. Everything works fine (Networkmanager, WPA2, etc.) The only thing I experience is a very bad performance. I

Re: [gentoo-user] iwl4965 performance

2008-03-26 Thread Thomas Kahle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi again, the problem seems to be related to WEP Encryption. Today I tried in a WPA-Enterprise Network and it was much faster and more responsive too... I will give the subobtions and 2.6.24 kernel a try anyway. Thanks Tom Thomas Kahle wrote: |

[gentoo-user] iwl4965 performance

2008-03-24 Thread Thomas Kahle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I am using the iwl4965 driver which is included in the kernel 2.6.25-rc6. Everything works fine (Networkmanager, WPA2, etc.) The only thing I experience is a very bad performance. I cannot get more than around 30 kb/s. Also the responses are