Re: [gentoo-user] kde-4.1 SLOT in kdesvn-portage

2008-09-22 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag 22 September 2008 03:42:39 schrieb ext Jerry McBride: Hmmm maybe you guys would know I've gone the same route as you. However, I've emerge 4.1.65. It compiles fine, installs, no problems. And you don't wonder why 4.1.65 follows 4.1.1? That's 4.2-(pre?)-alpha! The next 4.1

[gentoo-user] kde-4.1 SLOT in kdesvn-portage

2008-09-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
Hi, I use the kdesvn-portage overlay (the portage one, not the paludis-only one). To still stay this side of sanity, I emerged the 4.1.1 SLOT. I updated layman -S today only to find that the entire kde-4.1 SLOT has been removed. Can someone confirm? Am I actually dreaming? Anyone know why a

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-4.1 SLOT in kdesvn-portage

2008-09-21 Thread Mike
Alan McKinnon wrote: Hi, I use the kdesvn-portage overlay (the portage one, not the paludis-only one). To still stay this side of sanity, I emerged the 4.1.1 SLOT. I updated layman -S today only to find that the entire kde-4.1 SLOT has been removed. Can someone confirm? Am I actually

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-4.1 SLOT in kdesvn-portage

2008-09-21 Thread Mike
Mike wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: Hi, I use the kdesvn-portage overlay (the portage one, not the paludis-only one). To still stay this side of sanity, I emerged the 4.1.1 SLOT. I updated layman -S today only to find that the entire kde-4.1 SLOT has been removed. Can someone confirm? Am

Re: [gentoo-user] kde-4.1 SLOT in kdesvn-portage

2008-09-21 Thread Jerry McBride
On Sunday 21 September 2008 09:26:15 pm Mike wrote: Mike wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: Hi, I use the kdesvn-portage overlay (the portage one, not the paludis-only one). To still stay this side of sanity, I emerged the 4.1.1 SLOT. I updated layman -S today only to find that the entire