Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
Hello Wang, Baojun, I've got the following error while upgrade libusb from libusb-0.12 to libusb-0.12-r1 failed with USE flag doc, it will be ok with -doc: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. jade -t sgml -d ./website.dsl\#html ./manual.sgml jade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2/ent/iso-amsa.ent:8:19:E: X21B6 is not a function name This sort of error is often fixed by re-emerging openjade. -- Neil Bothwick Stop tagline theft! Copyright your tagline (c) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
Neil Bothwick wrote: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line and I thought it was for the man/info pages. I have to have those, even though I don't always understand them. lol Thanks Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
On Saturday 06 October 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote: Hello Wang, Baojun, I've got the following error while upgrade libusb from libusb-0.12 to libusb-0.12-r1 failed with USE flag doc, it will be ok with -doc: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at the very beginning, now if I remove the doc USE flag globally, most of the packages in my system will need a rebuild, and that's take a very long time. jade -t sgml -d ./website.dsl\#html ./manual.sgml jade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2/ent/iso-amsa.ent:8:19:E: X21B6 is not a function name This sort of error is often fixed by re-emerging openjade. I've re emerged jadetex openjade, but still have the same problem. I can masked it temporaly in /etc/portage/package.use, Thanks! Wang -- Wang, BaojunLanzhou University Distributed Embedded System Lab http://dslab.lzu.edu.cn School of Information Science and Engeneering[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tianshui South Road 222. Lanzhou 73 .P.R.China Tel:+86-931-8912025Fax:+86-931-8912022 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
Hello Wang, Baojun, Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at the very beginning, now if I remove the doc USE flag globally, most of the packages in my system will need a rebuild, and that's take a very long time. You could set it in /etc/portage/package.use for individual packages as they come up for upgrade, then change it globally and rebuild when you have the time. It's not as though the system can't be used while emerging and not all packages use this flag anyway. -- Neil Bothwick Set phasers to extreme itching! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
Hello Dale, Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line and I thought it was for the man/info pages. I have to have those, even though I don't always understand them. lol % grep doc /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc doc - Adds extra documentation (API, Javadoc, etc) man, info and doc pages are installed by default. To change this, add noman noinfo nodoc to FEATURES. -- Neil Bothwick Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:32:31 Dale wrote: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line and I thought it was for the man/info pages. Yes. man and info pages must be installed regardless of USE=doc. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
On Saturday 06 October 2007 21:01:06 Neil Bothwick wrote: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at the very beginning, now if I remove the doc USE flag globally, most of the packages in my system will need a rebuild, and that's take a very long time. You could set it in /etc/portage/package.use for individual packages as they come up for upgrade, then change it globally and rebuild when you have the time. It's not as though the system can't be used while emerging and not all packages use this flag anyway. Or he could stop using --newuse for a while... -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 21:10:26 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: You could set it in /etc/portage/package.use for individual packages as they come up for upgrade, then change it globally and rebuild when you have the time. It's not as though the system can't be used while emerging and not all packages use this flag anyway. Or he could stop using --newuse for a while... That's far too straightforward a solution ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Bother, said Pooh, realising that Tiggers really are wonderful things. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
Neil Bothwick wrote: Hello Dale, Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE line and I thought it was for the man/info pages. I have to have those, even though I don't always understand them. lol % grep doc /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc doc - Adds extra documentation (API, Javadoc, etc) man, info and doc pages are installed by default. To change this, add noman noinfo nodoc to FEATURES. Thanks. Drive space and maybe some compile time. Wo ho. Dale :-) :-)
RE: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc
This sort of error is often fixed by re-emerging openjade. I've re emerged jadetex openjade, but still have the same problem. I can masked it temporaly in /etc/portage/package.use, Thanks! I also tried re-emerging openjade with no result. I re-emerged an sgml package and that fixed it. I think it was sgml-common from memory. I found the answer via google easily... -Ad -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
