Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:41:19 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered: On Tuesday 24 April 2012 01:21:33 David W Noon wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:59:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote Plain text is what I have always specified. Kmail seems to want

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Stroller
On 24 April 2012, at 08:36, Peter Humphrey wrote: ... Would someone please confirm whether this has had the desired effect? Many thanks. Thank you. Very much appreciated. Stroller.

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 17:24:48 Stroller wrote: On 24 April 2012, at 08:36, Peter Humphrey wrote: ... Would someone please confirm whether this has had the desired effect? Many thanks. Thank you. Very much appreciated. I can only apologise to all that it took me so long to find the

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Stroller
On 23 April 2012, at 19:53, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: … We all noticed that you are using KMail once more, because you are sending HTML messages with a huge font and bold typeface to the list. Any chance of you reconfiguring KMail not to send HTML messages? Please ... pretty please ... :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote: There must be 10,000 items per day listed on eBay, maybe 100,000 [OT] I believe it to be over a million per day. The site has sold something like 750,000 items per day since its beginning on average, and many more

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Monday 23 April 2012 20:41:27 Stroller wrote: So I have to either tolerate Peter's choice of font size, or I have to sacrifice being able to read these other messages in their optimum format. As I said in another e-mail, I have not made any such choice. Ever. Now I appreciate that my

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread David W Noon
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:59:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered: Plain text is what I have always specified. Kmail seems to want to override my preferences. Try under the Security option of KMail Settings. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 01:21:33 David W Noon wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:59:01 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote Plain text is what I have always specified. Kmail seems to want to override my preferences. Try under the Security option of KMail Settings. That's the only reference I can find

[gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Philip Webb
Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! Between Intel Udev, I'm feeling somewhat abused today, but Gentoo User mailing-list came thro' yet again : I hope

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! Between Intel Udev, I'm feeling somewhat abused today, but Gentoo User mailing-list came

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Philip Webb
120421 Dale wrote: Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it ignore files. We can dream I guess. Yes why did

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: 120421 Dale wrote: Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it ignore files. We can dream I

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Stroller
On 21 April 2012, at 15:25, Philip Webb wrote: 120421 Dale wrote: Philip Webb wrote: You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! That's the same way files in /etc/portage/ works too. I do wish we could put a # on the front to make it

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:06:08 -0500, Dale wrote: Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! The problem here is that the file is created automatically,

Re: [gentoo-user] new mobo : Eth0 recovered

2012-04-21 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:06:08 -0500, Dale wrote: Thanks again for the help : I'm now back in my 2007 machine able to send e-mails. You actually have to remove the offensive file from the dir, not simply rename it to 'xx70xx...' ! The problem here is that the file is