On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, LostSon wrote:
Hey
I would like to use nptl and did not use it as a use flag when
installing my gentoo system. When adding this to my use flags what other
packages would i have to compile to get use of nptl ?? Thanks
I thought there were two nptl-related USE flags - the
Hey
I would like to use nptl and did not use it as a use flag when
installing my gentoo system. When adding this to my use flags what other
packages would i have to compile to get use of nptl ?? Thanks
--
LostSon
http://www.lostsonsvault.org
Fox Cities Linux User Group = www.foxlug.org
add it to your use flags, make sure to env-update, then type emerge -DNavu world
On 7/9/05, LostSon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
I would like to use nptl and did not use it as a use flag when
installing my gentoo system. When adding this to my use flags what other
packages would i have to
Mark Shields wrote:
add it to your use flags, make sure to env-update, then type emerge -DNavu
world
On 7/9/05, LostSon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
I would like to use nptl and did not use it as a use flag when
installing my gentoo system. When adding this to my use flags what other
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:15 +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Saturday 09 July 2005 17:37, LostSon wrote:
Hey
I would like to use nptl and did not use it as a use flag when
installing my gentoo system. When adding this to my use flags
what other packages would i have to compile to get use of
On 16/05/05, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think I should re-emerge a gtk package?
- Grant
what does emerge --deep --newuse --update world say?
--
Money can't buy everything.
Sometimes money can't even buy a gun...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Do you think I should re-emerge a gtk package?
- Grant
what does emerge --deep --newuse --update world say?
I do that every day. That's why I got into Gentoo to tell you the truth.
But nothing to report there. I did update to firefox 1.0.4 the other
day and I hadn't checked it since.
On 17/05/05, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think I should re-emerge a gtk package?
- Grant
what does emerge --deep --newuse --update world say?
I do that every day. That's why I got into Gentoo to tell you the truth.
But nothing to report there. I did update to firefox
Don't know if re-emerging every package firefox depends on will solve
the issue, but worth a try.
That's quite a list. Is there a better way than this:
emerge -ave mozilla-firefox
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Don't know if re-emerging every package firefox depends on will solve
the issue, but worth a try.
Whaddaya know! re-emerging firefox fixed it. Thanks!
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I re-emerged glibc with +nptl and +nptlonly on a workstation and now
firefox (1.0.4) is a little screwy. The input areas on the browser
(not the page) looks like HTML form inputs, there is no scrollbar, and
the fonts aren't smooth anymore. I tried moving ~/.mozilla but the
problems remain.
I
Grant wrote:
I re-emerged glibc with +nptl and +nptlonly on a workstation and now
firefox (1.0.4) is a little screwy. The input areas on the browser
(not the page) looks like HTML form inputs, there is no scrollbar, and
the fonts aren't smooth anymore. I tried moving ~/.mozilla but the
problems
On 16/05/05, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I re-emerged glibc with +nptl and +nptlonly on a workstation and now
firefox (1.0.4) is a little screwy. The input areas on the browser
(not the page) looks like HTML form inputs, there is no scrollbar, and
the fonts aren't smooth anymore. I tried
I re-emerged glibc with +nptl and +nptlonly on a workstation and now
firefox (1.0.4) is a little screwy. The input areas on the browser
(not the page) looks like HTML form inputs, there is no scrollbar, and
the fonts aren't smooth anymore. I tried moving ~/.mozilla but the
problems remain.
Grant wrote:
Do you think I should re-emerge a gtk package?
- Grant
Not unless you are having trouble with other GTK apps. But
moving/deleting ~/.gtkrc-2.0 may be useful. For reference, mine
contains only:
gtk-font-name = Sans 12
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I'm next here with ~x86.
Andrew
=== On Monday 16 May 2005 21:12, Qian Qiao wrote: ===
I had a x86 and a amd64 system both running nptlonly, none of them
experienced the problem you mentioned.
Don't think that's a nptl problem.
-- Joe
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I have recently built a new Gentoo 2005.0 box with a stage3 tarball. I
set the NPTL flag (among others) and rebuilt the entire system. It does
not appear that NPTL is sticking and I am not at all sure why; instead
it has pulled in the linuxthreads package. Can anybody help out here?
See
I have recently built a new Gentoo 2005.0 box with a stage3 tarball. I
set the NPTL flag (among others) and rebuilt the entire system. It does
not appear that NPTL is sticking and I am not at all sure why; instead
it has pulled in the linuxthreads package. Can anybody help out here?
You
Dave Nebinger wrote:
I have recently built a new Gentoo 2005.0 box with a stage3 tarball. I
set the NPTL flag (among others) and rebuilt the entire system. It does
not appear that NPTL is sticking and I am not at all sure why; instead
it has pulled in the linuxthreads package. Can anybody help
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Dave Nebinger wrote:
I have recently built a new Gentoo 2005.0 box with a stage3 tarball. I
set the NPTL flag (among others) and rebuilt the entire system. It does
not appear that NPTL is sticking and I am not at all sure why; instead
it has pulled in the
You can also set the nptlonly flag for glibc, which will avoid using
linuxthreads at all (forces everything to use nptl).
If you look at the OP's message, it appeared that he did have the nptlonly
flag set... There is the message about glibc/gcc masking off some use flags
for stability
Hi,
What do you think. Will I get better performance if I turn on NPTL on a
AMD 1800+ Athlon XP 512MB RAM. I use this machine for desktop purposes.
KDE, XMMS, Firefox, Tvtime, Kdevelop, Wesnoth, K3B, some audio- video
recording and so on.
Advantages? Disadvantages?
TIA.
Cheers,
Tamas Sarga
What do you think. Will I get better performance if I turn on NPTL on a
AMD 1800+ Athlon XP 512MB RAM. I use this machine for desktop purposes.
KDE, XMMS, Firefox, Tvtime, Kdevelop, Wesnoth, K3B, some audio- video
recording and so on.
NPTL performs better than the legacy linuxthreads, so yes
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
use the command
# getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION
NPTL 2.3.4
or check for the existence of /lib/tls directory, this one keep the
files when both are installed
Excellent:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] glibc # getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION
NPTL 2.3.4
So, why is the output for
I have one more question. What is the end-user difference between NPTL
and NPTL-only. I know, that later won't compile linuxthreads, but what
does it mean? Does all in-portage applications support NPTL, or some
apps will fail to compile, or will be slower cause of the miss of
linuxthreads, or
25 matches
Mail list logo
