Hello,
I am installing an ~amd64 box with gcc-5.2.
When I run prelink -amR on the box I get a long list of errors like the
following:
prelink: /lib64/libattr.so.1: Conflict 05c0 not found in any
relocation
prelink: /lib64/libattr.so.1: Conflict 0890 not found in any relocation
prelink:
I do use libreoffice-bin, but not firefox-bin and thinderbird-bin (I do
compile them from source). I already tried revdep-rebuild and
lafilefixer, even emerge -ave @world but nothing changes.
Thanks,
Niccolò
laptop ~ # prelink -amR
prelink: /usr/bin/lddlibc4: Using /lib32/ld-linux.so.2, not
On Thursday 17 February 2011 18:25:47 Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
Well, what got me once was the trip a package took. I ordered
something, can't remember what it was now but anyway, it left Memphis,
went to Atlanta and sat there a day or two, then went to some place in
Kentucky and sat there
Mick wrote:
Since this is the gentoo-user mailing list I better explain that routing of
parcels is performed so as to minimise journeys (hence fuel and driver costs)
for the company, rather than minimise delivery time for the end customer.
Usually they may delay a journey to make sure that the
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:58:04 +, Mick wrote:
Since this is the gentoo-user mailing list I better explain that
routing of parcels is performed so as to minimise journeys (hence fuel
and driver costs) for the company, rather than minimise delivery time
for the end customer. Usually they may
On Friday 18 February 2011 11:45:54 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:58:04 +, Mick wrote:
Since this is the gentoo-user mailing list I better explain that
routing of parcels is performed so as to minimise journeys (hence fuel
and driver costs) for the company, rather than
Mick wrote:
Hmm ...
$ euse -i dhl
global use flags (searching: dhl)
no matching entries found
local use flags (searching: dhl)
no matching entries found
No good, but hold
on 02/17/2011 09:05 AM Thanasis wrote the following:
on 02/15/2011 05:54 PM Kfir Lavi wrote the following:
I have just upgraded my laptop to 8GB (90$ ebay ddr3).
I now use tmpfs on /var/tmp and /tmp/ and run catalyst with all sorts
of experiments.
Take care I needed to provide more inodes to
Dale wrote:
Well, what got me once was the trip a package took. I ordered
something, can't remember what it was now but anyway, it left Memphis,
went to Atlanta and sat there a day or two, then went to some place in
Kentucky and sat there for a day or two. Then it went back to Memphis
Petri Rosenström wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I was curious. I have this new rig and was wondering if prelinking would
help any. It's a 4 core AMD 3.2Ghz CPU with 4Gbs, soon to be 8Gbs, of ram
and a SATA 3 hard drive. On a modern system, would
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:04:38 -0600, Dale wrote:
I used it on a older and pretty slow rig once and it did help. I think
it was 800Mhz with 512Mbs of ram. It also had some much slower IDE
drives too. It wasn't a huge difference but you could tell the
difference.
Some of the googling I did
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:04:38 -0600, Dale wrote:
I used it on a older and pretty slow rig once and it did help. I think
it was 800Mhz with 512Mbs of ram. It also had some much slower IDE
drives too. It wasn't a huge difference but you could tell the
difference.
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 13:49:40 Dale wrote:
I think I'll leave it alone. The new ram may make some things faster tho.
It'll be interesting to hear whether it makes any difference. I'm sure it
will if you're currently swapping to disk a lot (are you?), but otherwise
only during en emerge
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 02:04:38 -0600, Dale wrote:
I used it on a older and pretty slow rig once and it did help. I think
it was 800Mhz with 512Mbs of ram. It also had some much slower IDE
drives too.
I have a ssd.
I always used prelink.
After a botched gcc upgrade I was forced to reinstall (yeah, THAT botched).
I forgot to install prelink.
I did not miss it.
I realized that I forgot prelink when Neil started his glibc thread and I had
a look with eix.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 13:49:40 Dale wrote:
I think I'll leave it alone. The new ram may make some things faster tho.
It'll be interesting to hear whether it makes any difference. I'm sure it
will if you're currently swapping to disk a lot (are you?), but
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, turned out my ram is coming from NJ instead of Memphis. May take a
extra day or so. It did ship this morning tho. I plan to max out at 16Gbs
and put portage on tmpfs. That should be big enough even to compile OOo
then.
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, turned out my ram is coming from NJ instead of Memphis. May take a
extra day or so. It did ship this morning tho. I plan to max out at 16Gbs
and put portage on tmpfs. That should be big enough
I was curious. I have this new rig and was wondering if prelinking
would help any. It's a 4 core AMD 3.2Ghz CPU with 4Gbs, soon to be
8Gbs, of ram and a SATA 3 hard drive. On a modern system, would prelink
make anything that much faster? Is it worth installing in this system?
Thoughts?
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I was curious. I have this new rig and was wondering if prelinking would
help any. It's a 4 core AMD 3.2Ghz CPU with 4Gbs, soon to be 8Gbs, of ram
and a SATA 3 hard drive. On a modern system, would prelink make anything
that
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:27 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/prelink-howto.xml is says:
You do not need to set FEATURES=prelink in your make.conf
file; Portage will automatically support prelink if it can
find the prelink binary.
Does that mean
On http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/prelink-howto.xml is says:
You do not need to set FEATURES=prelink in your make.conf
file; Portage will automatically support prelink if it can
find the prelink binary.
Does that mean there's a way portage will call prelink on its own when
it finds it?
On 2 Oct, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello Helmut,
I want to create a shared library, say libULIB.so,
which needs additional shared libraries, e.g. libmpfr.so and
libgmp.so .
My users only use
Helmut Jarausch ha scritto:
On 2 Oct, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello Helmut,
I want to create a shared library, say libULIB.so,
which needs additional shared libraries, e.g. libmpfr.so and
libgmp.so .
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Helmut Jarausch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to create a shared library, say libULIB.so,
which needs additional shared libraries, e.g. libmpfr.so and
libgmp.so .
My users only use the functions provided by libULIB.so.
Is there a means to prelink
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello Helmut,
I want to create a shared library, say libULIB.so,
which needs additional shared libraries, e.g. libmpfr.so and
libgmp.so .
My users only use the functions provided by libULIB.so.
Is
Hi,
I want to create a shared library, say libULIB.so,
which needs additional shared libraries, e.g. libmpfr.so and
libgmp.so .
My users only use the functions provided by libULIB.so.
Is there a means to prelink libULIB.so, so that the libraries
libmpfr.so and libgmp.so are not needed by the
(I originally posted this on gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64, but even though
GMane authorized me to post there, my posts don't get through. So I'm
reposting it here.)
Usually, when prelinking a system, it's recommended to use prelink's
-m (or --conserve-memory) option:
When assigning addresses
On Dienstag, 26. August 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
(I originally posted this on gmane.linux.gentoo.amd64, but even though
GMane authorized me to post there, my posts don't get through. So I'm
reposting it here.)
Usually, when prelinking a system, it's recommended to use prelink's
-m (or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
HI all,
I am just noticed some output from *prelink* and I couldn't explain the
error message:
*prelink*: /usr/bin/hklplot: Could not parse `/usr/bin/hklplot: error
while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libccif.so: Filters not
supported with
I followed HOWTO Hashstyle on gentoo-wiki
(http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Hashstyle) days ago. However, I found
/etc/cron.daily/prelink produces Segmentation fault. In command line,
I tried the following:
# prelink -aqR
Segmentation fault
How to resolve this?
`emerge --info` followed:
Portage
Hi folks,
when prelinking, what are undefined non-weak symbols? And how can I avoid
them? ;-)
Uwe
--
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
well, this is a good question. Actually i'm not seeing any
incredible boost in performance, excluding a reduced need of RAM
memory.
I would like to add that these extra RAM saving is really very
useful in increase the responsiveness of all the system and thus
apparent extra speed.
AFAICT, this is the expected result. Without KDE_IS_PRELINKED or
KDE_FORK_SLAVES you will see many more kdeinit processes.
yes of course, this is true a lot of more kdeinit processes...
The real question is is it faster?
well, this is a good question. Actually i'm not seeing any
Hi lists,
i've followed the gentoo prelink-howto
(http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/prelink-howto.xml) and everything went
well during setup. I've also set KDE_IS_PRELINKED=1 in
/etc/env.d/99kde-env to inform KDE about the prelinking (and not
KDE_IS_PRELINKED=true). This should (following the howto)
On 4/16/06, Marco Calviani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi lists,
i've followed the gentoo prelink-howto
(http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/prelink-howto.xml) and everything went
well during setup. I've also set KDE_IS_PRELINKED=1 in
/etc/env.d/99kde-env to inform KDE about the prelinking (and not
Hi Richard,
Did you remember to run env-update?
Even with this, KDE still loads some things through kdeinit or
klauncher. For those, try setting KDE_FORK_SLAVES=1.
http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdebase/userguide/environment-variables.html
-Richard
yes, i run etc-update. I've also
On 4/16/06, Marco Calviani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, i run etc-update. I've also added that KDE_FORK_SLAVES option but
with no results.
No, not 'etc-update', 'env-update'. That is the command that takes
all of the /etc/env.d/* settings and rolls them into /etc/profile.
When you run 'env',
Hi Richard,
No, not 'etc-update', 'env-update'. That is the command that takes
all of the /etc/env.d/* settings and rolls them into /etc/profile.
yeah, of course i mispelled in the mail. i've actually made the
env-update..
When you run 'env', do you see the KDE_IS_PRELINKED and
On 4/16/06, Marco Calviani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
13441 1.4 0.5 24348 7240 ?Ss 22:41 0:00 kdeinit Running...
13446 0.2 0.5 24608 7636 ?S22:41 0:00 klauncher [kdeinit]
13524 1.5 0.9 32244 12336 ?S22:41 0:00 knotify [kdeinit]
AFAICT, this is
I did:
USE=pic emerge glibc
emerge prelink
# prelink -amR
prelink: /usr/bin/gnome-name-service: Could not find one of the dependencies
prelink: /usr/bin/goad-browser: Could not find one of the dependencies
prelink: /usr/bin/loadshlib: Could not find one of the dependencies
prelink:
On Mon, 16 May 2005, sIbOk wrote:
I did:
USE=pic emerge glibc
emerge prelink
# prelink -amR
prelink: /usr/bin/gnome-name-service: Could not find one of the dependencies
prelink: /usr/bin/goad-browser: Could not find one of the dependencies
prelink: /usr/bin/loadshlib: Could not find one of
thanks rapid answer, i solved the problems a few hours ago, just some
packages needed to be reemerged after USE=pic emerg glibc, now i
have only one error with acroread, recompiling it didn't help, i read
that the error could be for being compiled with another version of
binutils but that's not
43 matches
Mail list logo
