Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

2016-11-19 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis > wrote: >> >> Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a >> look: >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

2016-11-19 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a > look: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems > > There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I really

Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

2016-11-16 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > > I knew Gentoo doesn't force the use of dbus, but I had the flag set, > since I expected assorted breakages. For example, when viewing a pdf > file, will updating the view when the file changes be possible without >

Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

2016-11-16 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 161114-21:49+, Jorge Almeida wrote: > I live without dbus. I've only recently noticed (can't be since long) > there is a dbus flag. > I knew Gentoo doesn't force the use of dbus, but I had the flag

[gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

2016-11-16 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 161114-21:49+, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > Am Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:32:59 + > > >> --config-file=/usr/share/defaults/at-spi2/accessibility.conf --nofork > >> --print-address 3 > >> 417 ?Sl 0:00