On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Yes, this much was in place.
I wondered later if the issue is that my current kernel has DRM
selected so that I Can get the radeon driver from the kernel. Possibly
for the ATI driver I need to completely deselect DRM,
On 11/8/05, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Yes, this much was in place.
I wondered later if the issue is that my current kernel has DRM
selected so that I Can get the radeon driver from the kernel. Possibly
On 11/8/05, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Yes, this much was in place.
I wondered later if the issue is that my current kernel has DRM
selected so that I Can get the radeon driver from the kernel. Possibly
Mark Knecht wrote:
So with the realtime kernels I cannot even built the ATI drivers at
this time. I don't really know what to make of that. Maybe time will
tell.
I think you need the 8.18.8-r1 for 2.6.14-gentoo kernels, at least
that's what the ChangeLog for ati-drivers says (apparently
Hi,
Is the following expected with recent ati-drivers? Is this slotted?
If so, and if I did the --deep --update command, then how do I know
which one I'm using when I load fglrx?
Thanks,
Mark
lightning ~ # emerge -pv ati-drivers ati-drivers-extra
These are the packages that I would merge,
Mark Knecht schreef:
Hi, Is the following expected with recent ati-drivers? Is this
slotted?
No, and no.
If so, and if I did the --deep --update command, then how do I know
which one I'm using when I load fglrx?
fglrxinfo would tell you the version of the ati-drivers in use.
But... there
On 11/7/05, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht schreef:
Problem here-- afaik-- is that the drivers-extra package is hooked to
the drivers package of the same version.
The --deep update of the drivers-extra package requires the 'same'
version of the drivers package as it
emerge -p ati-drivers ati-drivers-extra
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] media-video/ati-drivers-8.18.8-r1
[ebuild R ] media-video/ati-drivers-extra-8.18.8
Do you maybe have a mask on ati-drivers-extra?
Holly
Mark Knecht wrote:
From someone on the LKML I found out that the ATI binary drivers won't
work on a 64-bit kernel so this is suddently not such an issue for me.
The 32-bit drivers won't work on a 64-bit kernel, but ATI does provide
64-bit binary drivers as well (and the ebuild should download
On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
From someone on the LKML I found out that the ATI binary drivers won't
work on a 64-bit kernel so this is suddently not such an issue for me.
The 32-bit drivers won't work on a 64-bit kernel, but ATI does provide
64-bit
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 32-bit drivers won't work on a 64-bit kernel, but ATI does provide
64-bit binary drivers as well (and the ebuild should download the
correct one depending on whether you're on a 64-bit or 32-bit Gentoo
install.)
--
On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 11/7/05, Manuel McLure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 32-bit drivers won't work on a 64-bit kernel, but ATI does provide
64-bit binary drivers as well (and the ebuild should download the
correct one depending on whether
Mark Knecht wrote:
Yes, this much was in place.
I wondered later if the issue is that my current kernel has DRM
selected so that I Can get the radeon driver from the kernel. Possibly
for the ATI driver I need to completely deselect DRM, rebuild the
kernel, and then emerge the ATI drivers?
I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
