Hi,
Checking the news (eselect news read), I see that an upgrade to udev-217
might break firmware loading, so the news tagged 2014-11-07-udev-upgrade
says that a kernel = 3.7 should be configured to:
CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n
Is it that simple? Trying a new kernel build using menuconfig,
On 11/10/2014 8:21 AM, Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking the news (eselect news read), I see that an upgrade to udev-217
might break firmware loading, so the news tagged
2014-11-07-udev-upgrade says that a kernel = 3.7 should be configured to:
CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=n
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 11/10/2014 8:21 AM, Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking the news (eselect news read), I see that an upgrade to udev-217
might break firmware loading, so the news tagged
2014-11-07-udev-upgrade says that
2014-11-10 12:37 GMT-02:00 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
On 11/10/2014 8:21 AM, Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking the news (eselect news read), I see that an upgrade to udev-217
might break firmware
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com wrote:
So, if I understood something, I will probably have to check this
configuration entry every time I build a new kernel from now on, because
menuconfig will probably set this on because of its dependencies, is this
2014-11-10 13:42 GMT-02:00 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Francisco Ares fra...@gmail.com wrote:
So, if I understood something, I will probably have to check this
configuration entry every time I build a new kernel from now on, because
menuconfig will
Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page, and
the only thing left that I'm unsure/concerned about now is the
persistent net rules changes...
The very last line on the wiki page says:
4. Known problems
Stale 70-persistent-net.rules (or other network rules) in
Anyone else run into this problem with udev-171-r9? I updated
yesterday and my CD/DVD, which has been /dev/cdrom1 since I built the
machine 2 1/2 years ago, is now called /dev/scd0.
Machine is x86_64, mostly stable.
- Mark
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:59:34AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Anyone else run into this problem with udev-171-r9? I updated
yesterday and my CD/DVD, which has been /dev/cdrom1 since I built the
machine 2 1/2 years ago, is now called /dev/scd0.
Machine is x86_64, mostly stable.
- Mark
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Bruce Hill
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:59:34AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Anyone else run into this problem with udev-171-r9? I updated
yesterday and my CD/DVD, which has been /dev/cdrom1 since I built the
machine 2 1/2
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:54:15AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks Bruce. That at least goes a long way toward explaining why the
system is acting the way it's acting. Threw me for a loop I must say.
Interestingly I don't have the elog file you show above. (Not sure I
should, just saying
11 matches
Mail list logo
