Re: [gentoo-user] Someone broke kde overlay :P
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:41 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: What's the deal with: !! Couldn't download 'oxygen-icons-4.4.92.tar.xz'. Aborting. Note the .xz extension. Where the heck do I get that? Why using something like this in the first place? Why don't the tarballs I downloaded from my local KDE mirror work anymore? Why should I trust tarballs that are not distributed by upstream? Please, please, don't do that. I'm sure whoever is responsible for this is just misinformed about something. Thank you :-) This isn't the bitch and moan mailing list. If you've got problems with an overlay maintainer, then take it to the overlay maintainer. General support questions come here. Having said that, you *are* using an overlay. Caveat emptor, and I'm not absolutely certain, but I have a pretty good idea that KDE doesn't even have a oxygen-icons-4.4.92.
Re: Re: [gentoo-user] Someone broke kde overlay :P
And to answer the original statement: the kde overlay often puts the ebuilds in before the sources themselves hit the mirrors. And the .xz compression format is the successor to the .lzma format, if I recall correctly...you should have xz-utils on your system.Chris ReffettOn Jul 12, 2010, Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:41 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: What's the deal with: !! Couldn't download 'oxygen-icons-4.4.92.tar.xz'. Aborting. Note the ".xz" extension. Where the heck do I get that? Why using something like this in the first place? Why don't the tarballs I downloaded from my local KDE mirror work anymore? Why should I trust tarballs that are not distributed by upstream? Please, please, don't do that. I'm sure whoever is responsible for this is just misinformed about something. Thank you :-) This isn't the bitch and moan mailing list. If you've got problems withan overlay maintainer, then take it to the overlay maintainer. Generalsupport questions come here.Having said that, you *are* using an overlay. Caveat emptor, and I'mnot absolutely certain, but I have a pretty good idea that KDE doesn'teven have a oxygen-icons-4.4.92.
Re: [gentoo-user] Someone broke kde overlay :P
Albert Hopkins wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:41 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: What's the deal with: !! Couldn't download 'oxygen-icons-4.4.92.tar.xz'. Aborting. Note the .xz extension. Where the heck do I get that? Why using something like this in the first place? Why don't the tarballs I downloaded from my local KDE mirror work anymore? Why should I trust tarballs that are not distributed by upstream? Please, please, don't do that. I'm sure whoever is responsible for this is just misinformed about something. Thank you :-) This isn't the bitch and moan mailing list. If you've got problems with an overlay maintainer, then take it to the overlay maintainer. General support questions come here. Having said that, you *are* using an overlay. Caveat emptor, and I'm not absolutely certain, but I have a pretty good idea that KDE doesn't even have a oxygen-icons-4.4.92. According to this, they do: http://www.kde.org/info/4.4.92.php http://kde.mirrors.tds.net/pub/kde/unstable/4.4.92/src/ OP, may want to download them there instead. Dale :-) :-)
Re: Re: [gentoo-user] Someone broke kde overlay :P
It's Overlay - this is how it work's. It's buggy stack thats why it's called Overlay. Otherwise the Code from Overlay should be in main stream in regular portage. Please don't complain that Overlay don't work. Try emerge about 3-4 days after error occures. 2010/7/12 mellitus...@verizon.net And to answer the original statement: the kde overlay often puts the ebuilds in before the sources themselves hit the mirrors. And the .xz compression format is the successor to the .lzma format, if I recall correctly...you should have xz-utils on your system. Chris Reffett On Jul 12, 2010, *Albert Hopkins* mar...@letterboxes.org wrote: On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 14:41 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: What's the deal with: !! Couldn't download 'oxygen-icons-4.4.92.tar.xz'. Aborting. Note the .xz extension. Where the heck do I get that? Why using something like this in the first place? Why don't the tarballs I downloaded from my local KDE mirror work anymore? Why should I trust tarballs that are not distributed by upstream? Please, please, don't do that. I'm sure whoever is responsible for this is just misinformed about something. Thank you :-) This isn't the bitch and moan mailing list. If you've got problems with an overlay maintainer, then take it to the overlay maintainer. General support questions come here. Having said that, you *are* using an overlay. Caveat emptor, and I'm not absolutely certain, but I have a pretty good idea that KDE doesn't even have a oxygen-icons-4.4.92. -- Mateusz Mierzwiński Bluebox Software http://www.blueboxsoft.pl/mateusz-mierzwinski
Re: [gentoo-user] Someone broke kde overlay :P
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: What's the deal with: !! Couldn't download 'oxygen-icons-4.4.92.tar.xz'. Aborting. Note the .xz extension. Where the heck do I get that? Why using something like this in the first place? Why don't the tarballs I downloaded from my local KDE mirror work anymore? Why should I trust tarballs that are not distributed by upstream? Please, please, don't do that. I'm sure whoever is responsible for this is just misinformed about something. Thank you :-) Looks like it was just fixed an hour ago, resync the overlay and it should use bz2 now: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=commit;h=4b27971ed556c29f6396414a8f5b0868f1ad61d0
