On Wednesday 30 May 2007 21:42, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 16:57, Mick wrote:
I find it confusing. First of all I do not have a id_rsa.
it tries the default keys (id_rsa or id_dsa), if exists.
id_rsa does not exist in my local /home/michael/.ssh/ only id_dsa is there
Hi,
On Sun, 27 May 2007 16:21:03 +0200 Michal 'vorner' Vaner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First: You need to load the kernel from the swap, in the time it
loads, you have no running kernel (well, there is a little part, but
that one has no clue about network).
No, that's not entirely true.
Hello
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:28:20PM +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
On Sun, 27 May 2007 16:21:03 +0200 Michal 'vorner' Vaner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First: You need to load the kernel from the swap, in the time it
loads, you have no running kernel (well, there is a little part, but
On Thursday 31 May 2007 07:42, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 21:42, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 16:57, Mick wrote:
I find it confusing. First of all I do not have a id_rsa.
it tries the default keys (id_rsa or id_dsa), if exists.
id_rsa does not exist in my
Hi,
On Thu, 31 May 2007 11:42:48 +0100 Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Second, my id_dsa is my private key not my public key. My public
key is id_dsa.pub
but you will need your private key to be authenticated. that's why
it is *private*.
That's right, so why does it:
Mauro Faccenda wrote:
being a redhat, i suppose
that it uses redhat with more less the default configuration, that tries to
read your public key on your user home in the server (~/.ssh/authorized_users
or ~/.ssh/authorized_users2).
This is something I've wondered about for a while - what's
Hi,
On Thu, 31 May 2007 09:08:38 -0400 Randy Barlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mauro Faccenda wrote:
being a redhat, i suppose
that it uses redhat with more less the default configuration, that
tries to read your public key on your user home in the server
(~/.ssh/authorized_users or
On Thursday 31 May 2007 09:38, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
wrote:
Second, my id_dsa is my private key not my public key. My public
key is id_dsa.pub
but you will need your private key to be authenticated. that's why
it is *private*.
That's right, so why does it:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:14, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 07:42, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 21:42, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
[snip]
debug1: Offering public key: /home/michael/.ssh/id_dsa
debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password
On 31/05/07, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:14, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
you should try creating your key pair again with:
$ ssh-keygen -t dsa
I would, but it seems to work fine with other servers, hence the point of this
thread. What I am going to try out
Howdy all! I'm having a tough time getting DHCP to work on my wireless card.
It's the intel 2200, and I am using wpa_supplicant with it. The contents of
my /etc/conf.d/net are:
modules=( wpa_supplicant )
config_eth1=( dhcp )
wpa_supplicant_eth1=-Dwext
The problem seems to be that DHCP isn't
So I've learned a bit more about why my wireless interface may not be
using DHCP - apparently the startup script isn't finishing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ sudo rc
* Caching service dependencies ...
[ ok ]
* WARNING: netmount is scheduled to start when
Am Donnerstag 31 Mai 2007 02:24 schrieb Bo Ørsted Andresen:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 00:34:04 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:45:40 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 21:15:28 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
bunzip2: /home/dsl/distfiles/openmotif-2.2.3-r9.tbz2:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 18:16:13 Florian Philipp wrote:
Ah, the possibility I hadn't thought of is the emul-linux-x86-* packages
some of which use portage binpkgs in their SRC_URI. In this case it's
emul-linux-x86-xlibs/emul-linux-x86-xlibs.
But why does it only affect *.tbz2. I've
Am Donnerstag 31 Mai 2007 18:22 schrieb Bo Ørsted Andresen:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 18:16:13 Florian Philipp wrote:
Ah, the possibility I hadn't thought of is the emul-linux-x86-*
packages some of which use portage binpkgs in their SRC_URI. In this
case it's
broken /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgcjawt.la (requires
/usr/lib/lib-gnu-java-awt-peer-gtk.la)
broken /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/libgij.la (requires
/usr/lib/libgcj.la)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728#c29
--
Bo Andresen
Thanks, Bo -- editing the .la
Hi All,
I noticed that when I open an attachment from within Kmail it adds odd
extensions to the file, which are retained when I later on try to save it on
the disk; e.g. a spreadsheet opened with OOo is shown as: Notes from
yesterdays mtg.xls_[yQHODa].
Furthermore, when I click on SaveAs in
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:38, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
But it _is_ a client message. It doesn't tell you where the server is
searching. So yes, the server might be off track and searching in the
wrong place. You could tell by monitoring the server's logs.
sshd will always search in the home
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 05:09 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
The equal sign was a mistake. I've actually been meaning to poke you about
that. At the same time you should drop the --emptytree parsing and just
use --deep directly. With the circular deps in the tree now that gets much
better
On Thu, May 31, 2007 2:28 pm, Mick wrote:
Aha! We're getting somewhere. There's no /home/mic specified in
/etc/passwd
but /:
mick:x:502:10::/:/bin/bash
What do you make of this?!
That's surely not right, try changing it to
mick:x:502:10::/home/mic:/bin/bash
--
Randy Barlow
Hi,
On Thu, 31 May 2007 19:28:09 +0100
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sshd will always search in the home directory as specified
in /etc/passwd (in the normal case) or more sophisticated solutions
like LDAP or NSS. So make sure it really *is* configured as the home
directory.
Aha!
Randy Barlow schrieb:
Howdy all! I'm having a tough time getting DHCP to work on my wireless card.
It's the intel 2200, and I am using wpa_supplicant with it. The contents of
my /etc/conf.d/net are:
modules=( wpa_supplicant )
config_eth1=( dhcp )
wpa_supplicant_eth1=-Dwext
The
and why I'm getting an IPv6 address? Thanks!
Every link that is up gets a link-local ipv6 address which is used to
find and communicate with direct link partners. It probably starts with
fe80::. So don't worry, that's caused by the ipv6 module and you don't
get it, you basically just have
On Thursday 31 May 2007 14:52, Sascha Hlusiak wrote:
I had this problem once too, and my problem was that a file
/etc/conf.d/net.eth1 existed, which had config_eth1=(null) in it. The
statements in /etc/conf.d/net had no effect then. Maybe that's the same
issue here.
No, that file doesn't
On 5/31/07, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that when I open an attachment from within Kmail it adds odd
extensions to the file, which are retained when I later on try to save it
on
the disk; e.g. a spreadsheet opened with OOo is shown as: Notes from
yesterdays mtg.xls_[yQHODa].
Hi,
after I recently upgraded to 21.4-r2 the graphical pulldown menus vanished
for textmenus and with jde ctrl-c-v-c for compiling is no longer working.
Is there some new USE-flag for emacs one should know about?
Regards,
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet:
Hi,
will there be a unionfs for 2.6.20 kernels? AFAIK there's only the 1.5_pre
for 2.6.19.
Regards,
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otkerstr. 28, 81547 Muenchen, Germany. Tel +49 89 69370185
I always stumble around endlessly whenever I attempt to use math
symbols in emerge commands.
To Neil B and others who have patiently explained this to me on
several occasions... I can only plead deep seated idiocy but I'm not
getting why this happens.
I want to `unmerge' (-C) versions of
Konstantinos Agouros [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış:
Hi,
will there be a unionfs for 2.6.20 kernels? AFAIK there's only the 1.5_pre
for 2.6.19.
Regards,
Konstantin
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can
either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel.
-Original Message-
From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
Ali Polatel wrote:
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm
tree. You
Ali Polatel wrote:
You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm tree. You can
either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel. Have a look at
http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html for more info..
But there's no unionfs-utils unless you're using sabayon overlay...
The subject line is half joke... but I just did an sync and then
emerged portage as suggested. After the emerge of portage, emerge
process went on and uninstaqlled a couple of versions of emacs-cvs.
As you can see in the command output below... there was no hint of
what was coming:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS.
What exactly is it, and what does it do?
(:P Besides the statement that it is an FS.)
Let's ask our friend: http://www.google.com/search?q=unionfs
http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html
Great for livecds (among other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış:
-Original Message-
From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
Ali Polatel wrote:
You should use
Em Quinta 31 Maio 2007 23:24, Richard Marz escreveu:
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel. ACPI is the one my system uses, but I've also tried APM and my
system still doesn't manage to shut the power off on it's own. My
motherboard is ATX but I'm forced
-Original Message-
From: Ali Polatel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 10:46 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] yazmış:
snip
I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS.
No. But, I will try it now. I'll let you know if it works in a few
minutes because I'm downloading the latests kernel sources.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:30 -0300, Davi wrote:
shutdown -h now -P
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel. ACPI is the one my system uses, but I've also tried APM and my
system still doesn't manage to shut the power off on it's own. My
motherboard is ATX but I'm forced to shut it down as if it were an AT
mobo. Is there
Richard Marz wrote:
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel. ACPI is the one my system uses, but I've also tried APM and my
How old is your bios?
Have you tried acpi=force kernel param?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Richard Marz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:40 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Shutdown -h now is not powering
down system.
No. But, I will try it now. I'll let you know if it works in
a few
HI...
On 31/05/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--prune makes no checks of what's still required.
[SNIP]
But doesn't --prune just remove all but the most recent installation
of a given package?
Yes.
I knew there was a reason I followed a --prune up with a -DNuva
world as
Richard Marz wrote:
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel. ACPI is the one my system uses, but I've also tried APM and my
system still doesn't manage to shut the power off on it's own. My
motherboard is ATX but I'm forced to shut it down as if it were an
It seems to be giving me the same behaviour as shutdown -h now.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 22:39 -0400, Richard Marz wrote:
No. But, I will try it now. I'll let you know if it works in a few
minutes because I'm downloading the latests kernel sources.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:30 -0300, Davi wrote:
I will try that right now.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:51 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Richard Marz wrote:
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel. ACPI is the one my system uses, but I've also tried APM and my
How old is your bios?
Have you tried
My Bios is up to date. It's not the BIOS. Shutdown has been confirmed to
work with linux and freebsd kernels on my machine in the past.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:51 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
Richard Marz wrote:
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel.
I'll try this as well.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 22:57 -0500, Dale wrote:
Richard Marz wrote:
I have all the appropriate power management interfaces enabled in my
kernel. ACPI is the one my system uses, but I've also tried APM and my
system still doesn't manage to shut the power off on it's
46 matches
Mail list logo
