Setup:
Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
is win10 (64bit)
Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
However, my version of vbox is for a windows host (5.1.14). And
actually has the guest
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
The box that I'm upgrading is giving me:
[blocks B ]
...
But this is a video driver my box is using, and I'm logged into it directly so
if I unmerge the drive in use the xorg-server will crash and I I'll be in a
login prompt, isn't it?
Is it better to do
On 14.02.2017 03:12, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-14 02:43]:
>> On 13.02.2017 19:20, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>> Johannes Rosenberger [17-02-13 19:04]:
On 13.02.2017 17:57, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hogren
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Raffaele Belardi
wrote:
> Time ago when I upgraded nvidia-drivers from 295 to 3xx series there was no
> way to start X, it would crash immediately with my custom built kernel.
> After many tests I switched to a kernel config taken from a
Harry Putnam wrote:
Willie Mattthews writes:
Not sure I'm following you here. THe guest addtions come with the
Vbox and I've already installed them.
This is a windows 10 host and the vbox is the one installable on
windows. This is version 5.1.14
Guest additinos
Time ago when I upgraded nvidia-drivers from 295 to 3xx series there was no way to start
X, it would crash immediately with my custom built kernel. After many tests I switched to
a kernel config taken from a live CD which worked (and still works) fine with the 3xx
nvidia-drivers but pulls in a
On 02/14/17 07:30, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Willie Mattthews writes:
Not sure I'm following you here. THe guest addtions come with the
Vbox and I've already installed them.
This is a windows 10 host and the vbox is the one installable on
On 14.02.2017 16:09, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup:
>
>Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
>is win10 (64bit)
>
> Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
> app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
>
> However, my version of vbox is
The box that I'm upgrading is giving me:
[blocks B ] =x11-base/xorg-server-1.18[udev] required by
(x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.10.3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
^^
Harry Putnam wrote:
Setup:
Installing X on Vbox vm runnning gentoo (amd64 not strict). Host
is win10 (64bit)
Installing the xorg-server is calling for the installation of
app-emulation/virtualbox-guest-additions-5.0.32
However, my version of vbox is for a windows host (5.1.14). And
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> The box that I'm upgrading is giving me:
>
> [blocks B ] (" x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.18-r1)
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
>
Setup: VBox vm running gentoo(amd64) guest on a win-10 (64bit) host
Hardware: HP xw8600 - 2x Xeon CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz - 32 GB ram
Harry Putnam writes:
[...]
> Sorry to post the raw pile of output but last time a used a http link
> to a long log someone here told me that
On 02/05/2017 05:12 PM, Alex Thorne wrote:
> A wiki article would be great. I'd be happy to contribute my experiences
> with my Surface Pro 4 if I eventually get round to installing Gentoo on it.
>
I'm still plodding away at this. I found some patches to enable
multitouch and some other bits but
On 02/13/2017 10:17 AM, Poison BL. wrote:
>
> I've had more than one spinning rust drive fail hard over the years as
> well, though yes, you do usually have some chance of recovery from
> those. Gambling on that chance by leaving a given disk as a single point
> of failure is still a bad idea,
I had a crucial SSD drive too and it failed in the warranty but as I
didn't have the receipt they refused to honor it and said I was out of
warranty as based on the date they sold it to the store not the day the
store sold it to me.
Apparently failures on my model were a very common thing due
On 14.02.2017 21:22, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Johannes Rosenberger writes:
>
>>> Can anyone offer suggestions about this... is it even the right way to
>>> proceed?
>>>
>>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I have portage-2.3.3 installed and in my portage manpage it is mentioned:
>>
>> The file shall
Johannes Rosenberger writes:
>> Can anyone offer suggestions about this... is it even the right way to
>> proceed?
>>
>>
>
> Hello!
>
> I have portage-2.3.3 installed and in my portage manpage it is mentioned:
>
> The file shall reside in
On 02/13/2017 10:25 PM, Mick wrote:
> I was using discard and can't say I
> noticed any performance penalty on the OCZ drive. I removed it and set up a
> fstrim cron job and suddenly there is a major I/O bottleneck when the cron
> job
> runs. Perhaps I should be running it more often ...
>
On 02/14/2017 02:33 AM, Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> Time ago when I upgraded nvidia-drivers from 295 to 3xx series there was
> no way to start X, it would crash immediately with my custom built
> kernel. After many tests I switched to a kernel config taken from a live
> CD which worked (and still
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 10:17 AM, Poison BL. wrote:
> >
> > I've had more than one spinning rust drive fail hard over the years as
> > well, though yes, you do usually have some chance of recovery from
> > those. Gambling on that
All this raises an interesting question: How much effort is it
reasonable to expect a user to undertake just to use one of these
drives? I mean it's going to be very tough to argue that it should
require more than "plug in -> add partitions > boogie" I mean half of
what I'm hearing about how to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:00:03 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> I find the package.*-dirs very nice, too. Unfortunately, the tools like
> emerge, flaggie etc. seem to not always use the same file to write to,
> so the files get messed up over time.
Portage always writes to the end of the last
On Tuesday 14 Feb 2017 18:29:49 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Right now my drive is set up as if it were a black box that contains bits.
> I don't think it's reasonable for me to do anything more than that. =\
Well, no, but then you wouldn't, would you? Anybody else might take an
interest in the health
On 15.02.2017 00:00, scootergrisen wrote:
> When i download Gentoo Linux the file name might be called something
> like:
> livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
>
> This might be fine if you just want that file and want to use it
> straight away.
>
> But lets say like i just did downloaded multiple
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:22:50 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Something else about this entry in `man portage':
>
> [...]
> SYNOPSIS
>/etc/portage/make.profile/ or /etc/make.profile/
> site-specific overrides go in /etc/portage/profile/
> deprecated
>
When i download Gentoo Linux the file name might be called something like:
livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
This might be fine if you just want that file and want to use it
straight away.
But lets say like i just did downloaded multiple linux distributions
because i want to test them out
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> All this raises an interesting question: How much effort is it
> reasonable to expect a user to undertake just to use one of these
> drives? I mean it's going to be very tough to argue that it should
> require more than
Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> On 15.02.2017 00:00, scootergrisen wrote:
>> When i download Gentoo Linux the file name might be called something
>> like:
>> livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
>>
>> This might be fine if you just want that file and want to use it
>> straight away.
>>
>> But lets
On 02/14/2017 09:09 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can any say if pentoo is still under developement?
>
>
It looks like they have a beta from January.
http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/pentoo/Beta/Pentoo_amd64_default/
--
Willie Matthews
matthews.willi...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:00 AM, scootergrisen wrote:
> So would it not be better to use a file name like this?:
> gentoo-livedvd-amd64-multilib-20160704.iso
This is the correct approach, but people here hate making changes
unless it's coming from them and gives them
Can any say if pentoo is still under developement?
disable systemd via package mask;
https://github.com/dantrell/gentoo-project-gnome-without-systemd/blob/master/HACKING.md#differences-between-gnome-profiles
user flag settings
On Feb 10, 2017 6:02 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 06:15,
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 Feb 2017 01:51:01 wabe wrote:
> > Mick wrote:
>
> > > Have you noticed a difference between mounting partitions on them
> > > with the discard option, Vs running fstrim on a cron job?
> >
> > I noticed a big
33 matches
Mail list logo