Re: [gentoo-user] Comparatively slow clang startup vs. gcc - reasons?

2018-10-09 Thread P Levine
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:55 PM Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > Can we do something about this? I remember that llvm had optional static > libs, which apparently were removed completely. Is there something > that can be done with linker tricks (better relocation info?) when > building llvm/clang to

[gentoo-user] Comparatively slow clang startup vs. gcc - reasons?

2018-10-09 Thread Holger Hoffstätte
(paging Michał Górny..) I've noticed that clang has gotten really slow, and while it does great analysis during the various compilation stages (which is fine), the startup itself is a major contributor to perceived slowness. Nothing demonstrates this better than running ./configure in a random