On 30 August 2011, at 03:27, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
…
How can I get out of this:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/util-linux-2.20 [2.19.1-r1] USE=cramfs crypt
ncurses nls perl unicode -loop-aes -old-linux (-selinux) -slang -static-libs%
(-uclibc) 4,507 kB
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 05:03:21 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
I finally did this, but got further problems:
solfire:/rootemerge --color=n -p -v --newuse --update --deep world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~]
Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de [11-08-30 18:01]:
Am 30.08.2011 09:15, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
Personally, I'd put '=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r99 ~amd64 ~x86' in that
file. I have the conviction that versions with greater '-r' would be
better, since it's a revision to the same
If you checked sysvinit's changelog, the latest (-r3) has a note about
something that sysvinit will no longer make because it's now provided
by unix-utils. (Sorry, I forgot what, exactly).
So in this case, installing sysvinit -r3 will conflict with unix-utils.
It is not that unknown -- in the
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:15:07 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
It is not that unknown -- in the Gentoo world -- for a stable package
to pull in an unstable package, because packages don't get stabilized
at the same time.
It is not unknown, but it is wrong. Stable packages should never pull in
Am 30.08.2011 09:15, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
Personally, I'd put '=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r99 ~amd64 ~x86' in that
file. I have the conviction that versions with greater '-r' would be
better, since it's a revision to the same version.
'~sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88 ~amd64 ~x86' does the same as ~
Because I don't know Meino's arch ;)
Or, to be more precise, I have a common package.accept_keywords for
all my Gentoo systems, some of them x86 and others amd64, so it's a
habit of mine to unmask both :)
Rgds,
On 2011-08-30, Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
Am 30.08.2011
That's right. Not unknown, but incorrect.
Sorry for not writing that, I just kind of forgot.
(Been forgetful about many things, lately.)
Rgds,
On 2011-08-30, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:15:07 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
It is not that unknown -- in the
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:41:48 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
Or, to be more precise, I have a common package.accept_keywords for
all my Gentoo systems, some of them x86 and others amd64, so it's a
habit of mine to unmask both :)
It's just as easy to unmask neither. If an entry in package.unmask
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:27:16 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
How can I get out of this:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/util-linux-2.20 [2.19.1-r1] USE=cramfs crypt
ncurses nls perl unicode -loop-aes -old-linux (-selinux) -slang
-static-libs% (-uclibc) 4,507
Hi,
How can I get out of this:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ~] sys-apps/util-linux-2.20 [2.19.1-r1] USE=cramfs crypt ncurses
nls perl unicode -loop-aes -old-linux (-selinux) -slang -static-libs%
(-uclibc) 4,507 kB
[blocks B ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r3
Your sysvinit is 2.88-r1. Try upgrading it to 2.88-r3, as wanted by util-linux.
You may have to unmask it in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords
Rgds,
On 2011-08-30, meino.cra...@gmx.de meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
How can I get out of this:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild
Hi,
is it normal/ok, that an unmasked package pulls in a masked one?
Best regards,
mcc
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info [11-08-30 04:56]:
Your sysvinit is 2.88-r1. Try upgrading it to 2.88-r3, as wanted by
util-linux.
You may have to unmask it in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords
13 matches
Mail list logo
