On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:29:38 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
We should be pounding away on the fact that we're running out of
IP
addresses... period... end of story. If people ask about NAT,
then mention that the undersupply will be so bad that even NAT
won't
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack
thereof, in the case of IPV4). The people who are truly interested
On 12/03/2013 01:31, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary
because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique
one.
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack
thereof, in the case of IPV4).
3 matches
Mail list logo