Re: [gentoo-user] "sys-libs/glibc[crypt(+)]" is soft blocking sys-libs/libxcrypt
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 19:07:30 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote: > > > This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package. > > > To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in > > > /etc/portage/package.use.mask: > > > sys-libs/libxcrypt system > > > > Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask? > > > > > I guess so. I've never used it, but refer to the portage man page to > confirm. I did - before posting and making a fool of myself ;-) -- Neil Bothwick Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat. pgpInBzgkmeum.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] "sys-libs/glibc[crypt(+)]" is soft blocking sys-libs/libxcrypt
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 15:34, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 15:12:36 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote: > > > This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package. > > To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in > > /etc/portage/package.use.mask: > > sys-libs/libxcrypt system > > Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask? > > I guess so. I've never used it, but refer to the portage man page to confirm. Cheers, Arve
Re: [gentoo-user] "sys-libs/glibc[crypt(+)]" is soft blocking sys-libs/libxcrypt
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 15:12:36 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote: > This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package. > To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in > /etc/portage/package.use.mask: > sys-libs/libxcrypt system Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask? -- Neil Bothwick Tact is for people who don't understand sarcasm. pgpIkkfxdcIjV.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] "sys-libs/glibc[crypt(+)]" is soft blocking sys-libs/libxcrypt
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 11:54, n952162 wrote: > I'm not really clear on masking. > > 1. My /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords has no mention of glibc, so I think there's nothing to unmask. This file is for adding or removing keywords from packages (like amd64 or ~amd64). To "unmask and enable the crypt USE flag of sys-libs/glibc" you would put this in /etc/portage/package.use.mask: sys-libs/glibc -crypt > 2. "mask the system USE flag"? USE flags go into /etc/portage/package.use, correct? Is that "mask" an inexact expression? Anyway, a "system" USE flag? This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package. To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in /etc/portage/package.use.mask: sys-libs/libxcrypt system > 3. "mask >=virtual/libcrypt-2" > Like, ">=virtual/libcrypt-2" into /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords, just like that? To mask a package, you put it in /etc/portage/package.mask. Exactly as you write it here, but in a different file. > 4. But virtual/libcrypt:0/1 is not masked (to my knowledge). It is masked here. To unmask it, you could in /etc/portage/package.unmask put something like this: =virtual/libcrypt-1-r1 Regards, Arve
Re: [gentoo-user] "sys-libs/glibc[crypt(+)]" is soft blocking sys-libs/libxcrypt
On 4/3/22 10:27, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 10:23:25 CEST schrieb n952162: My emerge fails due to a collision with xorg-server and glibc. How can I find out where the problem is, actually? Output attached. Did you have a look at https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2021-10-18-libxcrypt-migration-stable.html Alex Thank you, yes, I forgot to check that. I put in --ignore-built-slot-operator-deps=y The conflict is gone but now I have a circular dependency. Recommended steps: * unmask and enable the crypt USE flag of sys-libs/glibc * mask the system USE flag of sys-libs/libxcrypt * mask >=virtual/libcrypt-2 * unmask virtual/libcrypt:0/1 I'm not really clear on masking. 1. My /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords has no mention of glibc, so I think there's nothing to unmask. 2. "mask the system USE flag"? USE flags go into /etc/portage/package.use, correct? Is that "mask" an inexact expression? Anyway, a "system" USE flag? $ equery uses sys-libs/libxcrypt python-exec: Invalid impl in /etc/python-exec/python-exec.conf: python3.7 [ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation] [ : I - package is installed with flag ] [ Colors : set, unset ] * Found these USE flags for sys-libs/libxcrypt-4.4.27: U I + - abi_x86_32 : 32-bit (x86) libraries - - static-libs : Build static versions of dynamic libraries as well - - test : Enable dependencies and/or preparations necessary to run tests (usually controlled by FEATURES=test but can be toggled independently) 3. "mask >=virtual/libcrypt-2" Like, ">=virtual/libcrypt-2" into /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords, just like that? 4. But virtual/libcrypt:0/1 is not masked (to my knowledge).
Re: [gentoo-user] "sys-libs/glibc[crypt(+)]" is soft blocking sys-libs/libxcrypt
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 10:23:25 CEST schrieb n952162: > My emerge fails due to a collision with xorg-server and glibc. How can I > find out where the problem is, actually? > > Output attached. Did you have a look at https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2021-10-18-libxcrypt-migration-stable.html Alex
