Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp - /var/tmp a problem with new udev?

2012-08-27 Thread Doug Hunley
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
 I assume you don't run dracut
 either.

correct

-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd   Web:
douglasjhunley.com
G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3



Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp - /var/tmp a problem with new udev?

2012-08-20 Thread Doug Hunley
I have this symlink on a new ~amd64 install without a separate /usr
and the latest udev and have no issues at all. I don't use a initramfs
or anything on this install either. fwiw

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
 I realize that new udev without dracut wants /usr part of root
 filesystem.

 The last few gentoo installations I have done all had
 /usr/tmp symlinked to /var/tmp and I don't believe I did this symlink
 manually.

 Will this be a problem with new udev and no dracut or are the programs
 that must run early trained not to use /usr/tmp?

 thanks,
 allan




-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd   Web:
douglasjhunley.com
G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3



Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp - /var/tmp a problem with new udev?

2012-08-20 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Mon, Aug 20 2012, Doug Hunley wrote:

 On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
 I realize that new udev without dracut wants /usr part of root
 filesystem.

 The last few gentoo installations I have done all had
 /usr/tmp symlinked to /var/tmp and I don't believe I did this symlink
 manually.

 Will this be a problem with new udev and no dracut or are the programs
 that must run early trained not to use /usr/tmp?

 thanks,
 allan

 I have this symlink on a new ~amd64 install without a separate /usr
 and the latest udev and have no issues at all. I don't use a initramfs
 or anything on this install either. fwiw

Thank you, that is what I wanted to hear.  I assume you don't run dracut
either.

allan

(PS top-posting is discouraged on this group)



Re: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp - /var/tmp a problem with new udev?

2012-08-20 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 20.08.2012 21:01, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
 On Mon, Aug 20 2012, Doug Hunley wrote:
 
 On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
 I realize that new udev without dracut wants /usr part of root
 filesystem.

 The last few gentoo installations I have done all had
 /usr/tmp symlinked to /var/tmp and I don't believe I did this symlink
 manually.

 Will this be a problem with new udev and no dracut or are the programs
 that must run early trained not to use /usr/tmp?

 thanks,
 allan

 I have this symlink on a new ~amd64 install without a separate /usr
 and the latest udev and have no issues at all. I don't use a initramfs
 or anything on this install either. fwiw
 
 Thank you, that is what I wanted to hear.  I assume you don't run dracut
 either.
 
 allan
 
 (PS top-posting is discouraged on this group)
 

Are there still programs out there using that directory, anyway? I
thought /usr/tmp is mostly for compatibility with ancient Unixes. Even
in the FHS it is a may be present clause.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature