Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Email client for a SLOW connection

2008-10-22 Thread Pe'ter, Csa'sza'r
Hi,

I am not very experienced with different email clients, however have you
seen Tinymail, Modest and may be some other?

http://www.tinymail.org/trac/tinymail

Tinymail is just a library for mobile environments. It is mainly
designed and written by Philip Van Hoof. He mentions TMut, Modest as
examples of clients using Tinymail.

May be these are good, may be not. I don't know. I just had the fortune
to work with Philip and on Modest for a month. I liked the style of him
and the team of Modest. I hope these will be successful softwares.

Pe'ter Csa'sza'r


Grant írta:
 I'm on an excruciatingly slow internet connection right now.  The
 email client seems to be the major productivity blocker.  Thunderbird
 spends a lot of time loading or whatever and squirrelmail is just
 slow.  Would something like mutt be an improvement?  Any other
 recommendations?
 
 - Grant
 



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Email client for a SLOW connection

2008-10-21 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm on an excruciatingly slow internet connection right now.  The
 email client seems to be the major productivity blocker.  Thunderbird
 spends a lot of time loading or whatever and squirrelmail is just
 slow.  Would something like mutt be an improvement?  Any other
 recommendations?

Is it running on your local machine? I think the amount of data
downloaded should be the same for any client which uses the same
protocol, I would think.

Obviously you can disable image loading for HTML emails. You could
also set it to download headers only, and bodies only when you open a
message. You can set Thunderbird to not check for new mail except for
when you tell it to.

You might also consider a web-based e-mail solution.

Figuring out where the slowness is worst (do you have 1000 emails in
your inbox?) and try to come up with a way to avoid it.

Good luck,
Paul



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Email client for a SLOW connection

2008-10-21 Thread Momesso Andrea
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:15:05AM -0700, Grant wrote:
 I'm on an excruciatingly slow internet connection right now.  The
 email client seems to be the major productivity blocker.  Thunderbird
 spends a lot of time loading or whatever and squirrelmail is just
 slow.  Would something like mutt be an improvement?  Any other
 recommendations?
 
 - Grant


When I use my gprs connection (5kb/s max download speed on well covered
areas) I feel confortable with mutt over gmail's imap.

Obviously I avoid opening messages with big attachments (mutt shows the
size of the message in a summary without opening it)




Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Email client for a SLOW connection

2008-10-21 Thread Willie Wong
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:15:05AM -0700, Penguin Lover Grant squawked:
 I'm on an excruciatingly slow internet connection right now.  The
 email client seems to be the major productivity blocker.  Thunderbird
 spends a lot of time loading or whatever and squirrelmail is just
 slow.  Would something like mutt be an improvement?  Any other
 recommendations?

Sorry, I don't quite understand your setup:

Are you:

  a) Running a remote desktop / X over ssh type scenario where you run
  Thunderbird from a server on your client over a slow internet
  connection? If so, then certainly using a text-based client like
  Mutt will help. 

  b) Reading mail that is stored remotedly on a local computer? via
  IMAP? In this case I cannot say, not having used Thunderbird or
  squirrelmail. This really depends on how efficiently the individual
  clients are coded, and the best way to find out is to just try them
  out and see if you get an improvement. Theoretically the limit
  imposed on the mail clients by your slow internet connection should
  be the same.

  c) doing something else completely?

Can you explain what you mean by Thunderbird loading? Loading what?
The program itself? Or a particular e-mail? 

As it stands, your e-mail really doesn't give us much information
about what your setup is and what you would like to improve. 

One thing that I just thought of: often it maybe faster (if you have
the access) to ssh into the mail server and run mutt there compared to
using IMAP. Especially with e-mails with attached pictures and HTML
mark-up: if you parse those on the server with lynx and send only the
text through the ssh, it will often be faster than downloading the
entire mail and parsing it locally. 

Regards, 

W
-- 
If you buy the paperback version of Maxwell's _Treatise_, on the cover, 
this diagram is drawn... worked out in the 1870's, without a pocket 
calculator...
   ~Prof. Kirk T. McDonald, DeathEM, P-town PHY 304
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 683 days, 14:34