Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

2009-08-03 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:38:32 + (UTC) James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Mike Kazantsev mk.fraggod at gmail.com writes: emerge -1 dev-util/strace strace -f ooffice 2strace.log grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

2009-08-03 Thread Dale
James wrote: Mike Kazantsev mk.fraggod at gmail.com writes: access(/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/ com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/ data/org/openoffice, F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) Why

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

2009-08-02 Thread Dale
James wrote: walt w41ter at gmail.com writes: IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing, you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk. I'm guessing that if you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those other packages get rebuilt against the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

2009-08-02 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:45:16 + (UTC) James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote: Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes: Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or something more secure? Nope,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

2009-08-02 Thread Dale
James wrote: Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes: Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions issue. You running something special on your system? Hardened or something more secure? Nope, It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation with OO for a