On 2014-09-16 22:43, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone here used ansible and at least one of puppet/chef?
What are your thoughts?
I've made several attempts over the years to get puppet going but never
really got it off the ground. Chef I stay away from (likely due to the
first demo of it I saw and
On 17/09/2014 03:30, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
We use bcfg2, and all I can say is to stay away. XML abuse runs rampant
in bcfg2. From what I've heard from other professional sysadmins, Puppet
is the favorite, but that's mostly conjecture.
XML. Ugh. OSSEC works like that too. The software itself
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:43:18 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone here used ansible and at least one of puppet/chef?
What are your thoughts?
I've made several attempts over the years to get puppet going but never
really got it off the ground. Chef I stay away from (likely due to the
On 17/09/2014 09:07, Tomas Mozes wrote:
On 2014-09-16 22:43, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone here used ansible and at least one of puppet/chef?
What are your thoughts?
I've made several attempts over the years to get puppet going but never
really got it off the ground. Chef I stay away from
On 17/09/2014 09:34, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:43:18 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone here used ansible and at least one of puppet/chef?
What are your thoughts?
I've made several attempts over the years to get puppet going but never
really got it off the ground.
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:12:52 AM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 17/09/2014 09:34, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:43:18 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone here used ansible and at least one of puppet/chef?
What are your thoughts?
I've made several attempts
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts.
Not so much for ~20 or so.
I find that for a few machines, puppet is overkill. For a lot of
machines, puppet can become unmanageable - with puppet master and
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:19:37 PM Eray Aslan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts.
Not so much for ~20 or so.
I find that for a few machines, puppet is overkill. For a lot of
On 17/09/2014 11:34, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:19:37 PM Eray Aslan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:43:18PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts.
Not so much for ~20 or so.
I find that for a few
On 2014-09-17 14:07, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Nagios btw has the same problem hence why I'm switching to Icinga 2
which fixes Nagios's config language once and for all.
Or you can use hostgroups/templates and have all your configuration in
files and in git. Depends what you like more.
On 2014-09-17 10:08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
That's almost exactly the same setup I have in mind.
How complex do the playbooks get in real-life?
The common role has about 70 tasks. It does almost everything covered in
the handbook plus installs and configures additional stuff like postfix,
On 17/09/2014 14:46, Tomas Mozes wrote:
On 2014-09-17 10:08, Alan McKinnon wrote:
That's almost exactly the same setup I have in mind.
How complex do the playbooks get in real-life?
The common role has about 70 tasks. It does almost everything covered in
the handbook plus installs and
We use bcfg2, and all I can say is to stay away. XML abuse runs rampant
in bcfg2. From what I've heard from other professional sysadmins, Puppet
is the favorite, but that's mostly conjecture.
Alec
On 09/16/2014 04:43 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone here used ansible and at least one of
13 matches
Mail list logo
