On Friday 01 Jan 2016 10:41:40 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 10:26:05 Mick wrote:
> > ... my kmail2 still seems to be functioning properly and without any major
> > problems so far. :-)
>
> What, not even duplicates? I'm still getting a dozen a day.
Hi Peter,
I think your
On Friday 01 January 2016 10:26:05 Mick wrote:
> ... my kmail2 still seems to be functioning properly and without any major
> problems so far. :-)
What, not even duplicates? I'm still getting a dozen a day.
--
Rgds
Peter
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 09:32:55 PM lee wrote:
>> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
>> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
>> >> > Are we at the point where users
On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 16:28:36 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, December 31, 2015 01:50:43 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 11:14:48 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > So, I'm reading the fine manual again, but I find myself asking questions
> > like ... how do I do this MySQL command on
On Friday 01 Jan 2016 13:06:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Thanks for your thoughts Mick. I think most of my problems have persisted
> through many iterations from the early days of KMail-2. At any rate, I've
> just deleted the whole KMail structure once more and reimported from
> archive and so
On Friday 01 January 2016 14:25:17 Mick wrote:
> On Friday 01 Jan 2016 13:06:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Thanks for your thoughts Mick. I think most of my problems have
> > persisted
> > through many iterations from the early days of KMail-2. At any rate,
> > I've
> > just deleted the whole KMail
On Friday 01 January 2016 11:47:16 Mick wrote:
> On Friday 01 Jan 2016 10:41:40 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Friday 01 January 2016 10:26:05 Mick wrote:
> > > ... my kmail2 still seems to be functioning properly and without any
> > > major problems so far. :-)
> >
> > What, not even duplicates?
On Friday, January 01, 2016 03:58:18 PM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 01 January 2016 14:25:17 Mick wrote:
> > On Friday 01 Jan 2016 13:06:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > Thanks for your thoughts Mick. I think most of my problems have
> > > persisted
> > > through many iterations from the early
On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 07:30:49 PM Mick wrote:
> On 29 December 2015 at 17:51, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> > > Can you please advise what GRANTS did you use to create a dedicated
> > > postgresql user for akonadi?
>
On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 11:14:48 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 07:30:49 PM Mick wrote:
> > Having been away from postgres for the best part of 7 years now, it is a
> > struggle to find my feet again. As a result I have been chasing my tail
> > on
> > this task today, not
On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 09:32:55 PM lee wrote:
> "J. Roeleveld" writes:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
> >> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
> >> > maintain
On Thursday, December 31, 2015 01:50:43 PM Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 31 Dec 2015 11:14:48 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 07:30:49 PM Mick wrote:
> > > Having been away from postgres for the best part of 7 years now, it is a
> > > struggle to find my feet again. As a
On 29 December 2015 at 17:51, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
>
> > Can you please advise what GRANTS did you use to create a dedicated
> > postgresql user for akonadi?
>
> Grants?
>
Yes, in the sense that the akonadi user will
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
>> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
>> > maintain a fully fledged RDBMS just for a single application which
>> >
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:51:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
> > > For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something
>
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
> > For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more
> > advanced needs to be used.
>
> I like sqlite because
Mick writes:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
>> For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more
>> advanced needs to be used.
>
> I like sqlite because it is
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 06:40:58PM +, Mick wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Joost for holding my hand on this. Last question for the
> day: It seems that postgresql wants to install xemacs as a dependency ... o_O
>
>
> # emerge -uaDv emerge
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
> For anything more advanced, either a wrapper is required or something more
> advanced needs to be used.
I like sqlite because it is self-contained, embedded in the application that
uses it
On 29 December 2015 19:40:58 CET, Mick wrote:
>On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:51:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> > > sqlite is nice, for single threaded applications.
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
> Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
> maintain a fully fledged RDBMS just for a single application which
> doesn't even need a database in the first place?
Yes, a sad state of affairs indeed. I was hoping for the last
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 18:49:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 29 December 2015 19:40:58 CET, Mick wrote:
> >On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:51:32 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 04:34:33 PM Mick wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 14:18:20 J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 07:43:07 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 18:49:03 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On 29 December 2015 19:40:58 CET, Mick wrote:
> > No. You are trying to emerge 'emerge'.
> > (Check the commandline :) )
> >
> > --
> > Joost
>
> Oops!
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:03:25 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 17:37:25 lee wrote:
> > Are we at the point where users are accepting to have to install and
> > maintain a fully fledged RDBMS just for a single application which
> > doesn't even need a database in the first place?
>
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 01:16:08 PM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 12:39:18 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:51:57 AM Mick wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > > This
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 12:39:18 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:51:57 AM Mick wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > This is good to know. An earlier akonadi bug would actually delete
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> Have you been able to use Kmail2 reliably on a *laptop*? What problems have
> you experienced? Has intermittent network availability caused loss of
> messages? Any gotchas and workarounds? Any suggestions?
I have been using Kmail2 for
On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > Have you been able to use Kmail2 reliably on a *laptop*? What problems
> > have you experienced? Has intermittent network availability caused loss
> > of messages? Any gotchas and
On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:51:57 AM Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 Dec 2015 10:20:23 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 09:53:24 AM Mick wrote:
> > > Have you been able to use Kmail2 reliably on a *laptop*? What problems
> > > have you experienced? Has intermittent network
29 matches
Mail list logo