Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-26 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/26/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: conftest echo works root # ./conftest echo works works Seems to have worked as expected. Looking at qpkg -v -I|grep gcc root # qpkg -v -I|grep gcc

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-26 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/26/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /var/tmp/portage/mod_php-4.4.0/work/php-4.4.0/config.log Some stuff after 200 lines looks like it might be pertinent so posting 250 lines. I hope you see something: This file contains any messages

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-26 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/26/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it normal to have 2 versions installed? Yes. Gcc is slotted, so it is normal to have more than one version installed. Do I need two versions?. Technically, no. But this is where I get a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Holly Bostick
Harry Putnam schreef: First let me add that (mjpegtools-1.6.2-r3) isn't even installed: root # qpkg -v -I |grep mjpegtools media-video/mjpegtools-1.8.0-r1 * equery depends mjpegtools [ Searching for packages depending on mjpegtools... ] media-video/transcode-0.6.14-r2

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Holly Bostick
Harry Putnam schreef: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (Including Richard in reply as well) Nagatoro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Assigning files to ebuilds... using existing /root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds. Evaluating package order... using existing Nagatoro replied:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/25/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It turn out that using old revdep output was not the problem. See just posted output in response to Nagatoro. Actually it was. Notice that revdep-rebuild is no longer trying to rebuild mjpegtools, but those things that depend upon mjpegtools

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/25/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh crap.. overzealous snippage caused me to leave out the main stuff: I seem to have taken a moron pill this morning please see full output of revdep-rebuild in a few minutes at:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Holly Bostick
Harry Putnam schreef: I still don't see the actual error there and it was the output of: revdep-rebuild -nc 21|tee revdep.log revdep.log is what I posted online. Richard Fish replied with the specific issue about half an hour ago: Richard Fish schreef: Ok, now we are going to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/25/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ok, now we are going to need to see the output of emerge --info, because for some reason your toolchain thinks it is cross-compiling: There appears to be some confusion in that output as to what USE

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/25/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -L/usr/X11R6/lib -ltiff -L/usr/lib) is a cross-compiler... yes Still thinks its a cross-compiler... what does

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-25 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/25/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: #line 1880 configure #include confdefs.h main(){return(0);} It then compiles this program. If the program compiles, configure decides that gcc works. If the program doesn't run, it decides

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-24 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/24/05, Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My guess is 'emerge -u --oneshot mjpegtools' will fix the problem. No, it didn't change a thing. But there was some output at the end that might mean something: [...] * Please upgrade your package

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How serious is revdep-rebuild failure

2005-11-24 Thread Richard Fish
On 11/25/05, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the result of ls /usr/portage/media-video/jpegtools/*.ebuild and equery depends mjpegtools Also, do you have anything for mjpegtools in /etc/portage/package.mask? -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list