Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 09:38:01 -0400 Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote: No clue, as logging isn't yet enabled. However, chechzone says that all is fine. Well that's your primary error right there. How can you run a daemon that isn't logging and consider that even halfway proper? Get some

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Andrey Moshbear
Bit by yet another EPERM :/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:29:40 -0400 Andrey Moshbear andrey@gmail.com wrote: Bit by yet another EPERM :/ An EPERM you say? How ... fascinating. Care to elaborate? -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: SERVFAIL with bind; problems in named.conf?

2011-10-05 Thread Andrey Moshbear
The zone file was 640 root:root. It should've been 640 root:named.