Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2015, 07:51:30 schrieb james:
I'll wait at least until there is an ebuild of some kind. Those folks
(toolchain) that put out the 5.0.x builds should have one for 5.1
soon.. I do agree with the subliminal suggestion that I should
find those gcc compile and
On 23.04.2015 19:18, james wrote:
Stefan G. Weichinger lists at xunil.at writes:
I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ... and maybe later I will try
at system in a btrfs-subvolume.
Hello Stephan,
Very interesting.
emerge -e @system
didn't get very far in my btrfs-subvolume (a
On 23.04.2015 23:06, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
I am sure it will enter portage soon ...
btw ... there you go:
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-5.1.0.ebuild?view=markup
On 04/23/2015 07:51:30 AM, james wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
So is my best hope the toolchain repo ?
You can always compile and install locally in your $HOME directory.
5.1
was just released, so you can try that.
I hear you. It'd take me a long time to
On 23.04.2015 10:12, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I've just renamed the gcc-6.0.0_alpha20150412.ebuild (the 6 must be typo)
from toolchain overlay
to gcc-5.1.0.ebuild which I have attached.
It worked just fine here.
same here, just a bit later ;-)
I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ...
On 04/22/15 12:37, james wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras realnc at gmail.com writes:
Lack of a version number always suggests latest master branch.
Good to know.
However, these are Chromium OS overlays. I don't think you're supposed
to be using them on Gentoo. They're for Chromium OS. For
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:19 + (UTC), james wrote:
Do our overlay lists matchup completely? Does the -R always check
the latest, or is their some updating syntax to ensure the remotes
are updated?
eix-remote update
--
Neil Bothwick
Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical
7 matches
Mail list logo