Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

2014-01-24 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello, On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm too but

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

2014-01-24 Thread Michael Higgins
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100 Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: Hello, On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

2014-01-24 Thread Chris Stout
FreeBSD use it and say is stable. FreeBSD maybe not the reference on earth but the BSD's make a good job. When i saw all versions of Clang is masked. Isn't FBSD more similar than, say, Linux, to what OSX is, sort of? I could be way off. But I think of OSX as being FBSD built for people

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

2014-01-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/01/2014 20:44, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very different. Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang

Re: [gentoo-user] llvm compile error

2014-01-23 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello, ok the version 3.3 run without problems, i think the 3.4. make troubles and the package Maintainer from Gentoo has hardmasked. Thank you for help Nice Day Silvio