Hello,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
different.
Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang
alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm too but
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100
Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something
very
different.
Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4
FreeBSD use it and say is stable. FreeBSD maybe not the reference on earth
but the BSD's make a good job. When i saw all versions of Clang is masked.
Isn't FBSD more similar than, say, Linux, to what OSX is, sort of? I could
be way off. But I think of OSX as being FBSD built for people
On 24/01/2014 20:44, Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
different.
Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang
Hello,
ok the version 3.3 run without problems, i think the 3.4. make troubles
and the package Maintainer from Gentoo has hardmasked.
Thank you for help Nice Day
Silvio
5 matches
Mail list logo