Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver-users Digest, Vol 58, Issue 76

2011-03-13 Thread ajs6f
We've had similar problems-- you can solve them in a number of different ways depending on whether and how you can alter the offending servlet and the configuration of Tomcat andGeoServer. You can put Saxon in a common library directory, or put Saxon into GeoServer's libraries, or rewrite the

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver-users Digest, Vol 56, Issue 86

2011-01-24 Thread ajs6f
What do you mean by editing layer from WFS service locally? You mean using a client on the same machine as the server? Are you getting normal results from WMS and plain WFS when you use other machines? When you use WFS-T are you getting a error, or nothing? If an error, do you have a

Re: [Geoserver-users] Geoserver in production

2010-12-31 Thread ajs6f
First, start here: http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/production/index.html I would emphasize: If you are serving large amounts of rendered imagery, caching is your friend. GeoWebcache is ready to go for the purpose and integrates well with GeoServer. If you are serving many features,

Re: [Geoserver-users] How to publish thousands of aerial photos? [SEC=Unclassified]

2010-12-07 Thread ajs6f
That's a very good point that I elided. We have been thinking to use a more traditional caching method (e.g. mod_cache) for some of these service operations, but the structure of OGC service calls makes that difficult. --- A. Soroka Digital Research and Scholarship R D and Online Library

Re: [Geoserver-users] mutiple sincronized maps in one window?

2010-10-07 Thread ajs6f
The simple answer is yes. The real answer is: that's going to depend entirely on your mapping client. It's not at all a GeoServer question. Assuming that you are working to the Web and that you're using OpenLayers (the Javascript toolkit responsible for the simple layer previews in GeoServer)

Re: [Geoserver-users] Setting forceXY in a webapp - not in a container

2010-09-22 Thread ajs6f
I welcome correction, but my understanding is that since a container runs inside a JVM, and system properties are set at the level of a JVM, you can't do that. Perhaps there's a different parameterization (using something other than a system property) that could provide the behavior you seek?