Re: [Geoserver-users] [Geotools-devel] forwarding GEBCO WMS fails - help needed

2024-04-25 Thread Ian Turton
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 14:02, Roar Brænden wrote: > > Certainly that first Accept header seems a little out-dated, but as Ian > mentioned it doesn't explain why we will get a 403 status code. > > > Because the ESRI devs don't understand how the web works! Ian -- Ian Turton

Re: [Geoserver-users] [Geotools-devel] forwarding GEBCO WMS fails - help needed

2024-04-25 Thread Roar Brænden
> 24. apr. 2024 kl. 15:34 skrev Andrea Aime : > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:30 PM Roar Brænden > wrote: > What I'm confused about is how the two classes should influence on what is > sent as Accept-header. Nothing in the code indicates something like that. >

Re: [Geoserver-users] [Geotools-devel] forwarding GEBCO WMS fails - help needed

2024-04-24 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:30 PM Roar Brænden wrote: > What I'm confused about is how the two classes should influence on what is > sent as Accept-header. Nothing in the code indicates something like that. > One is the built-in java client, the other the Apache one... I guess they might have

Re: [Geoserver-users] [Geotools-devel] forwarding GEBCO WMS fails - help needed

2024-04-24 Thread Roar Brænden
> 22. apr. 2024 kl. 15:01 skrev Peter Smythe : > > > > And then under what circumstances would the WMS data store fall back to the > Simple HTTPClient rather than using the MultithreadedHttpClient (HTTP > connection pooling), even if the above is ticked? > Hi, The answer to the question