--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar___
Actually, when creating a new datastore from PostGis, all the folders
are here, it's true. But still, the old folders coming from my GS
2.2.2 aren't recognized by 2.3.0. Even if it is the exact same
structure, I compared both (new created datastore vs original datastore).
Maybe it can come from
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Gabriel Vatin
gabriel.va...@mines-paristech.fr wrote:
Actually, when creating a new datastore from PostGis, all the folders are
here, it's true. But still, the old folders coming from my GS 2.2.2 aren't
recognized by 2.3.0. Even if it is the exact same
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Christian Mueller
christian.muel...@os-solutions.at wrote:
The new security sub sytem is focused on authentication, not authorization.
So nothing in the old service security subsytem was changed?
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit
Thanks for your response Martin. I'll have a look into clustering on the
database-side, I don't suppose you / any one else is aware of any
particularly good solutions for doing this? I would really like to find a
solutions that can take into account the zoom level when doing the
clustering.
On 20
Thanks Aime. The digest method was added at hand in 2.2.2 version.
Now, I guess the tutorial on GS webite should be updated, as
authentification panel has changed :
http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/security/tutorials/digest/index.html
And about my PostGis problem, that was indeed a
As far as I can remember, the only major change was how to calculate the
roles you can assign to resources. This was necessary since
- it is possible to have multiple role services
- there are some new system roles like ROLE_AUTHENTICATED
The role/resource logic was not touched by me and I think
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
You're correct, inability to provide access to the underlying points is a
limitation of the current PointStacker implementation. I'm not sure whether
it's possible to solve this within GeoServer using GetFeatureInfo. So
Now, for migrating to 2.3.0 I copied my whole data_dir, minus security
folder, to new server
And here is the problem. Geoserver 2.3.0 did not find its keystore
geoserver.jceks, as a consequence a new one was created.
Within the keystore, there is a key labeled
config:password:key
This key is
Hi list
I have seen this presentation on slideshare [1], and I would like to
get a try to the MongoDB plugin.
Was it finally released?
Only thing I could find is a GeoTools plugin [2], wondering if there
is anything more consolidated or if I can find any sort of
documentation to use the plugin in
That's it, great ! I used solution 1, copying security dir from 2.2.2 to
2.3.0 without extra of modified files from 2.3.0. Now I have all my
PostGis layers.
Thanks Christian !
Gabriel
On 21/03/2013 11:25, Christian Mueller wrote:
Now, for migrating to 2.3.0 I copied my whole data_dir, minus
Hi,
We are using GeoServer for a small Webmapping application and it works fine.
Now we are asked to be able to add lots (hundreds) of users. Which means heavy
load and scalability. And probably roughly 10 getmap / sec.
But we're having a hard time to figure out if geoserver is the right tool
Hi Paolo,
There is currently an unsupported module in GeoTools that provides access
to mongo, but its not being released through GeoServer in any way.
We have a few clients interested in mongo support and have recently looked
at the plugin. Unfortunately the plug-in is a bit specific to the
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:00 AM, PREVOSTO, Laurent laurent.prevo...@sfr.com
wrote:
Hi,
We are using GeoServer for a small Webmapping application and it works
fine.
Now we are asked to be able to add lots (hundreds) of users. Which means
heavy load and scalability.
Hi again,
No I've got a minor problem with the GWC componenent of GeoServer 2.3.0
: the Disk Used field also shows a 0.0B value. I can used the tiles of
my old GeoServer 2.2.2, or seed new ones, I never have any value for
this. Do you know what can cause that ?
In my configuration, Disk Quota
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, PREVOSTO, Laurent
laurent.prevo...@sfr.com wrote:
Now we are asked to be able to add lots (hundreds) of users. Which means
heavy load and scalability. And probably roughly 10 getmap / sec.
10 getmap a second is not heavy load, see this blog for a setup in which
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Gabriel Vatin
gabriel.va...@mines-paristech.fr wrote:
Hi again,
No I've got a minor problem with the GWC componenent of GeoServer 2.3.0
: the Disk Used field also shows a 0.0B value. I can used the tiles of
my old GeoServer 2.2.2, or seed new ones, I never
Ok, so that's my fault ! :) Indeed, I just changed it and Size is
displayed. In GS 2.2, I had Quota disabled, but the Disk Used was
displayed yet.
Thanks Aime.
Gabriel
On 21/03/2013 15:53, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Gabriel Vatin
gabriel.va...@mines-paristech.fr
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Gabriel Vatin
gabriel.va...@mines-paristech.fr wrote:
Ok, so that's my fault ! :) Indeed, I just changed it and Size is displayed.
In GS 2.2, I had Quota disabled, but the Disk Used was displayed yet.
Yeah, that was a bug in 2.2. Basically the disk quota
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Brister, Robert L
robert.bris...@gdit.com wrote:
Does this mean that the Disk Quota system is broken in 2.2.4? I am currently
clustering 4 Geoserver nodes to a single data directory and need the Disk
Quota turned off for this to work correctly.
If you did
I've been involved with projects that have done DB-side clustering (both in
PG and in SQLServer), but I don't have any code or docs about it. A Google
search should turn up something. If I get some time I'll try and write
down a sketch of how it can work.
It's pretty easy to snap point features
Agreed - all good points.
If GFI did access the RT output, I was thinking that it would be possible
to add a mode to the PointStacker RT where it returned all the original
features, but with a point coordinate set to the location of the computed
cluster point. Then this mode could be enabled in
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed - all good points.
If GFI did access the RT output, I was thinking that it would be possible to
add a mode to the PointStacker RT where it returned all the original
features, but with a point coordinate set to the
Does this mean that the Disk Quota system is broken in 2.2.4? I am currently
clustering 4 Geoserver nodes to a single data directory and need the Disk Quota
turned off for this to work correctly.
Thank
-robert
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Aime [mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it]
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed - all good points.
If GFI did access the RT output, I was thinking that it would be
possible to
add a mode to the PointStacker
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant that the new mode would compute a cluster point for groups of
features, but then return *each original feature* but having as geometry the
computed cluster point. So the GFI spatial filter would select all the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
Interesting idea. The clustering is based on a square grid, so it could
just return the grid cell outline. But what query would retrieve this
polygon? The RT output is only available to the renderer, right?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hum, no, you just have to do GFI in GML or JSON format, and you get
full attributes,
including the geometry.
Not sure I see how the output format fixes the problems of (a) GFI not
calling the RT and (b) the PointStacker
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Andrea Aime
andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Martin Davis mtncl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hum, no, you just have to do GFI in GML or JSON format, and you get
full attributes,
including the geometry.
Not sure I see how the
Dear All,
I'd like to know what should be the *(physical) specification of a Web Map
Server to server around 20* *users *simultaneously with good performance.
Anyone please give me advice.
What should be the specification of a *Map Server* to deliver the maps with
good performance If the users
30 matches
Mail list logo
