Hi all,
I'm running into an issue with serializing/deserializing ECQL filters
with ECQL.toCQL and ECQL.toFilter. In particular, I'm noticing that
these functions are not inverses when I pass in a temporal filter
containing Dates with milliseconds information specified. The millis
info is
Thanks Jody,
I've put up https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/519. I'm a little
unsure how much of the tests it made sense to duplicate. Also, given
that the current behavior is to truncate Dates to the second, I figured
it was reasonable to print the extra info if it is present, but
Message -
From:
Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com
mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com
To:
Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com mailto:jn...@ccri.com
Cc:
GeoTools Developers list
geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
mailto:geotools-devel
Jody,
Here's the ticket: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4867
More inline.
On 08/06/2014 04:23 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Additional comments inline:
If there were a general test, I imagine one could test the
DataStore interface rather than that ContentDataStore
Hi all,
I think I've found a small issue with how ID filters are serialized by
ECQL.toCQL. From what I can gather from the ECQL grammar, an ID filter
should either be ID (number) or ID('string'). The existent quote
check in FilterToECQL checks to see if there are .'s in the string which
I
Hi all,
I'm generally interested in the CQL parser. Is switching to the Maven
mojo project something I could contribute in a few weeks? (I'd be doing
it on personal time.)
Jim
On 08/16/2014 03:57 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I'd like to try and summarize the discussion so far to make sure that I
understand.
As a request comes into GeoServer, it would either be handled by a
custom GetMapCallback or by a distributed-render-aware Renderer by
GetMap. From there, the distributed GeoTools data/feature store
Hi all,
Jody, Tyler, and I hacked at this on Friday during a code sprint. The
partial results are here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/commits/matrix
There are a few remaining errors to track down, and the cautious part of
me wants to go back and cook up a set of unit tests for
Garnett
On 17 March 2015 at 10:36, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi Jody,
I just confirmed briefly: Who != 'Bierce' does not parse with
ECQL.toFilter; on the other hand, Who 'Bierce' is just fine.
Thanks for the merge and JIRA ticket.
This one
gap between the beta and the release is not doing
us much good - we really need to get RC1 tested)
--
Jody Garnett
On 17 March 2015 at 10:21, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi all,
Back at the OSGeo/LocationTech code sprint, I tried out GeoMesa
!= and ?
I am content to grab this pull request on to master, but this is very
close.
Here is your jira ticket for the release notes:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-5051
--
Jody Garnett
On 17 March 2015 at 09:35, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi
Hi all,
Back at the OSGeo/LocationTech code sprint, I tried out GeoMesa with
GeoTools 13.x. LocationTech is not allowing us to ship JAI, and we ran
into some issues as GeoTools tried to configure JAI logging without JAI.
Jody had submitted a PR to fix an issue when JAI is not present
Hi all,
Last Friday, some of my fellow GeoMesans noticed that ECQL.toFilter
writes out PropertyIsNotEqual with != rather than (which is what the
EBNF specifies). Anyhow, Chris tossed up a PR here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/772.
Anyhow, I wanted to start a discussion of the
are not escaped. I fiddled with cooking up filters with
Literals rather than PropertyNames, and those were escaped by code above.
Cheers,
Jim
On 03/30/2015 09:16 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On 30 March 2015 at 18:04, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
The EBNF does reference key
When/where is the mini-sprint going to be?
Jody floated the idea of doing something on Friday, and I'd be up for
hanging out and working on the various GeoTools/GeoServer things I'm
interested in.
Cheers,
Jim
On 03/03/2015 01:47 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
foss4gna mini-sprint
Are the previous accounts being transferred? Or will we all need to
request new accounts?
Thanks for handling the transition!
Jim
On 03/27/2015 02:28 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
There is an option to let users sign up, but I am scared to turn it on
due to spammers. I will set up PSC members
Hi all,
As a background, I'm trying to use GeoTools while excluding jai-core as
a dependency. This will likely be the required state of LocationTech
projects using GeoTools.
I goofed testing Jody's initial solution to the problem after a final
commit was added which used less reflection. I
solved. I know it is not pretty, but since when is
logging code pretty.
--
Jody Garnett
On 21 April 2015 at 11:44, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi all,
As a background, I'm trying to use GeoTools while excluding
jai-core
/change-from-vecmath-to-ejml
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 April 2015 at 11:04, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi all,
I know the release and moving from Codehaus are likely taking lots
of folks' cycles... I wanted to bump this thread. What kind of
timeline
to predict LocationTech IP timelines (sigh) - if
needed we can make a 14-M1 milestone release to the maven repository.
--
Jody Garnett
On 9 April 2015 at 15:08, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi Jody,
Yeah, I'm glad that I'm caught up enough to work
.
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 April 2015 at 11:10, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Jody,
Thanks. If I'm reading it right, the code sprint and my PR
should finish up 3.
Jim
On 04/20/2015 02:07 PM, Jody Garnett wrote
, none of which are named EPSG.sql.
--
Jody Garnett
On 28 April 2015 at 22:02, Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Jody,
Thanks! Shout if there's something else I can help with.
Jim
On 04/28
I replied about the same topic on the GeoServer-devel. For visibility,
I'll mention things here as well...
Eclipse had approved hsqldb 2.3.0, so we happily used Maven to manage
our version, and we didn't encounter any problems with that.
The biggest hsqldb issue we had is that Hadoop also
section of the proposal and stick your initials next to it
if you are in position to volunteer.
I hope other PMC members can review the plan and vote.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 3:12 PM Jim Hughes jn...@ccri.com
mailto:jn...@ccri.com wrote:
Hi all,
Jody, Tyler, and I hacked
First, the PR looks great, and I think my question is tangential. As a
broad question, is this something we could address at the
ContentDataStore level?
I ask since we had to solve this problem separately for the GeoMesa
datastore(1). We end up cooking up a new DataStore for something
Jody,
For the IP issue, if we don't hear back from Emanuele, what options do
we have? Would it be possible to remove the code or would we need a
'clean room' implementation?
In the latter case, I haven't seen the function in question (either in
the GeoTools or JAI core codebases). Perhaps
, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com
<mailto:jn...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Since this falls between GeoTools and GeoServer, I figured I'd
bump it and cross-post.
Phrased differently, "Does the CoverageFactory interface have the
same hooks f
- but it would be a fun bit of RnD that would benefit all
of geoserver.
--
Jody Garnett
On 4 February 2016 at 06:44, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com
<mailto:jn...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Since this falls between GeoTools and GeoServer, I figured I'd
bump it an
Hi all,
Since this falls between GeoTools and GeoServer, I figured I'd bump it
and cross-post.
Phrased differently, "Does the CoverageFactory interface have the same
hooks for auto EditPanel generation as the DataStore interface?"
As the minute, in order to add a raster data source, we are
Hi all,
As I mentioned on the GeoTools/GeoServer call today, the Eclipse
Foundation is doing a legal review of GeoTools and its transitive
dependencies. Jody, Tyler and others have helped extensively with the
process so far. Some more questions about ImageIO-Ext have come up...
The
Hi all,
From an IP review for GeoMesa's use of GeoTools (and hence
imageio-ext), the following questions came up:
1. For Benjamin Stark's contributions, is there any agreement or
license allowing for them to be in Imageio-ext? See these two files:
As you’ll notice this only applies to simple features. If working with
complex features i am actually not sure where that logic lives
anymore. One of the app-schema folks can point you at that if need be.
Hope that helps!
-Justin
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:09 AM Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.
Hi all,
Apologies for the cross-post, but my question hits a little of how
GeoServer handles WFS transactions and a little bit of how GeoTools may
handle WFS/GML parsing.
My high-level goal is to find a way to add security info to a WFS
transaction. I can see three big options: 1. add some
to address the
situation. For this task, the TransactionPlugins and Native tags do
provide one general solution already.
Thanks,
Jim
On 04/08/2016 11:50 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com
<mailto:jn...@ccri.com>> wrote:
My hig
this message
> that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty
> or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent
> messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they
> were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
der [mailto:chris.sni...@issinc.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 12:11 PM
> To: Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com>; Simone Giannecchini
> <simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it>
> Cc: geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; GeoTools Developers list
> <geotools-devel@lists.s
Hi all,
Will looking into some slow WFS paging/sorting results, I found that the
hint MAX_MEMORY_SORT is both 1) really low (1000) and 2) not
configurable from the commandline or GeoServer's UI.
Would anyone be fussed if we bumped the value from 1000? (Configured
here: (1).) Would something
t; Attending
> -
>
> Ben Caradoc-Davies
> Kevin Smith
> Jim Hughes
> Torben Barsballe
> Jody Garnett
> Dave Blasby
> Jukka Rahkonen
>
> Apologies
> -
>
> Brad Hards
> Andrea Aime
>
> Agenda
> --
>
> - Release of 15-beta2 / 2.9-beta2
> -
the same update?
--
Jody Garnett
On 19 April 2016 at 13:29, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com
<mailto:jn...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
The GeoTools PR for the Apache Collections update is here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1175.
Cheers,
Jim
On 04/1
Hi all,
I want to report on my success with registering and displaying GeoTiffs
stored on HDFS. There are some limitations with this approach;
particularly, I am unsure if there's anyway to cache / memory-map the
data. As such, I believe each request is re-downloading the entire file.
Hi all,
During the bug stomp, I looked into
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-4821 and noticed that the
coverage-multidim module has a few issues (1). First, the geotiff bit
depends on GeoTools 2.6-SNAPSHOT (and an gt-coverage-api-old module).
Second, for the hdf4 Maven module,
Hi all,
I'd like to participate as well; maybe you can kick a few of the easy
tasks my way.
Cheers,
Jim
On 7/11/2016 7:15 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Count me in!
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben.
>
> On 12/07/16 10:28, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> I tomorrows meeting I would like to firmly establish
Hi Devon, Jody,
This looks exciting! For the (E)CQL filters as predicates, is there any
chance those predicates could be passed down to the FeatureSource? Or
would there be different execution from...
featureSource.stream.filter(predicate)
and
On 8/6/2016 4:41 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Jody Garnett > wrote:
The sad part / danger / risk is that that our Filter interface
would only be one kind of predicate, and I would expect normal
java
Hi all,
In GeoMesa, we are using the ContentDataStore, etc abstract interfaces.
In the case of ContentDataStore.getSchema functions, I'd like to suggest
that getSchema(String typename) ought not be marked final.
For the DataStore in question, sufficient metadata is available at the
DataStore
Hi all,
Sorry I missed this until now. I'm not following too closely, but it
sounds like this is an improvement. If it requires a slight update to
any Coverage Readers, we can sort things out.
Cheers,
Jim
On 03/22/2017 09:56 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi Niels,
there is one test about
Hi all,
As a continuation of relicensing JTS we are hunting down where external
contributions came from.
For reading and writing with Oracle, JTS has based some of its code on
GeoTools. Examples of JTS code are below.
Would the GeoTools PSC approve give permission for JTS to relicense the
Hi Devon,
Big +1 for this module.
The module for S3 will be useful right now. Generally, I'd note that
there's a logical extension to move this module to use the Hadoop
FileSystem abstraction. With that kind of move, you'd be able to pick
up support for whatever someone implements support
Hi all,
Separate from the licensing, I believe that ElasticSearch uses Guava
18. GeoTools and GeoServer uses version 17.
Does ElasticGeo work with Guava 17?
Cheers,
Jim
On 06/02/2017 05:42 PM, sjudeng wrote:
Jody,
Thanks for your quick response. It does sound like a pain. I'll look
Hi Georg,
I don't have a complete answer for you, but you might check to see what
the META-INF/services directory in your fat jar has. From a quick read
of the Java docs for ParameterBlockJAI, it looks like a file like this
(1) may be important.
If that's the case, then you'll just need to
Ah, so you are using the ElasticSearch REST client then?
Sounds like a reasonable solution.
On 06/13/2017 05:56 PM, sjudeng wrote:
Hi Jim, In the last ElasticGeo release I removed the
org.elasticsearch:elasticsearch dependency and as a result freed it
from the transitive Guava dependency.
Hi Bret, Ian,
The JTS team is close to having a LocationTech approved release. (I'm
helping with some of the IP/Eclipse-related bits which the release
depends on.)
If there a bits you need in JTS, feel free to discuss them on the JTS
mailing list
On 12/15/2017 08:50 AM, Mark Prins wrote:
Broken isn't a very well defined state, it's quite a valid use case to
have (valid ofcourse) urls pointing all over the place.
Fair enough.:)
wrt following redirects; as geotools is still on an old version of
apache httpclient which doesn't provide
that, this seems like a time when a GetCapabilities document
should be re-written to be 'correct'.
Are there other approaches or ideas to consider?
Cheers,
Jim
On 12/12/2017 11:14 PM, Jim Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
Today I tried out the WFS-NG DataStore with a GeoServer configured
with HTTPS, and I hit
be worth considering if the GeoTools WFS-NG
datastore should have a work-around for a 'broken' environment?
Cheers,
Jim
On 12/12/2017 11:52 PM, Jim Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
And to answer my own question... the incorrect URL is coming from the
GetCapabilities document. Basically, I'm getting
Hi all,
Today I tried out the WFS-NG DataStore with a GeoServer configured with
HTTPS, and I hit two issues. I'll start with the one where I could use
some help...
I passed a url of the form https://hostname/geoserver/..., and after
connecting correctly (using a username and password),
.it <mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>>
wrote:
+1
Cheers
Andrea
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com
<mailto:jn...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
As a continuation of relicensing JTS we are hunting down where
page:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/JTS-ORA-Contribution
--
Jody Garnett
On 24 October 2017 at 13:19, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.com
<mailto:jn...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
To close the loop on this, did a letter get drafted and/or
approved for the Ora{Reader,
On 10/31/2017 01:47 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Opinion - great direction for visitor, think it would allow us to make
better use of collections model as a result. The functionality is used
for optimization in JDBC, but the ability to split/merge feature
visitors (including their result) would be
Hi all,
Jody and I have been working on some of the background tasks to upgrade
GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer to JTS 1.15.0 (or later). We have a proposal
here (https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Upgrade-to-JTS-1.15.0)
to track progress.
At the last GT/GS meeting, it was noted that
Hi all,
As a quick question, are there any impediments to publishing GeoTools
and GeoServer jars on Maven Central?
I believe the requirements could be met easily enough:
http://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html. (I've done this for
LocationTech projects like JTS and GeoMesa, and
a
reasonable plan.
http://central.sonatype.org/pages/requirements.html
Basically, I'm suggesting Maven central for Jars, and then
GitHub+SourceForge for wars/other binaries.
Cheers,
Jim
On 03/07/2018 10:38 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Jim Hughes <jn...@ccri.
Hi Jody,
To be honest, I'm not too worried about merging order.
As a bit more info, I ended up having forks of GeoDB, Jai-ext, and
Jaitools in order to build GeoTools (and GeoWebCache and GeoServer).
Given that 1) I haven't pushed those projects to have a JTS 1.15.0
release, 2) we don't
Hi Andrea,
We've done something similar in GeoMesa. We needed to implement a
JsonPathPropertyAccessor[1] and a JsonPathFilterFunction[2]. We used
Jayway for that and maybe json-simple2 somewhere along the way.
The unit tests cover lots of little corner cases we've already fussed
through.
Hi Jody, Devon,
Thanks for asking. From chatting with Emilio, we don't think it'd
affect anything in GeoMesa.
From a quick look at the ECQL reference, it looks like attributes with
non-alphanumeric characters should be double-quoted:
Hi Andrea,
Congrats, this is awesome! I'm glad you were able to clean up what I
started at the OSGeo code sprint!
Cheers,
Jim
On 5/19/2019 5:18 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi,
following on Jim's work I've prepared a build that seems to be doing
the trick, and building
in sequence:
*
Hi Sameera,
Should some of these contributions be to JTS directly? JTS already has
an implementation of DelaunayTriangulation[1]. How is your work different?
It may be worth chatting with the JTS team on gitter here:
https://gitter.im/locationtech/jts (or joining the JTS mailing list).
Hi Jody,
For what it is worth, I do this on projects like GeoMesa with merge
squashes both as I put a PR and when I merge a PR. This means that the
first line of commit will have the ticket number from the first commit.
Generally, I like linear histories with one commits solving one ticket!
Hi all,
As a happy coincidence, I was able to test the GeoTools RC with
GeoMesa. I did hit an issue or two.
The first one is that GeoMesa uses GeoTools library code to write out
GeoJson. Calls to FeatureJSON.writeFeature(SimpleFeature feature,
Object output) use GeoJSONUtil.encode(String,
ke
gt-epsg-* jars.
At this point, I've looked a little, and I'm not seeing anything obvious. If
folks have really quick suggestions, I'd appreciate it. That said, I'll keep
digging.
Cheers,
Jim
On 3/12/20 4:34 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 7:51 PM Jim Hughes <ma
,
and use it for the sources that happen to already be writer or a stream?
Cheers
Andrea
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 8:47 PM Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:
From API point-of-view, that makes sense. From a code
point-of-view, there's a writer created on line 274:
https://
as-is, the code maybe doing something
sensible.
Thoughts?
On 3/12/20 3:39 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Good timing on testing, it seems rough closing the writer after one
feature? I would update the javadoc to be clear about the API contract
and leave the writer open.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:50 AM Jim
Ian,
Can you say more about the builds failing?
I'm mildly interested. Occasionally, I end up needing to speak for all
the dependencies of GeoMesa (which pulls in GeoTools and a large swath
of Apache/Hadoop projects). I'm motivated to avoid CVE issues as close
to the 'source' as possible
I wonder if there's a sane way to plan in quarterly or twice-a-year
quick checks for these issues. That'd let us address the issues without
needing it to be someone's daily struggle.
Thoughts about an (optional) routine like that being 'added' to the
six-month release cycle?
Cheers,
Jim
stream.
This results in an inconsistent API contract... which I am not wild about.
Since this is an unsupported module should we just break the existing
API contract in order to be clear about expectations?
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 15:33, Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.
.
Cheers,
Jim
On 3/13/2020 3:34 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi Andrea,
Ah! The context that some of the Objects need closing and others
do not helps clarify things.
I just wrote a client sid
Hi all,
I wanted to follow up on this. I am glad we were able to test the
GeoTools RC and I think this dicussion has been useful. At the minute,
Emilio and I have ways to use either module to do what we want to in
GeoMesa. Given that, nothing here should hold up the release, etc.
Since
Hi all,
I'm digging into error handling around timeouts for a GeoTools DataStore
(the various GeoMesa DataStore implementations). In GeoServer, the
GeoMesa FeatureReader ends up being wrapped by the GeoTools
FeatureReaderIterator.
This class swallows exceptions from close() and hasNext().
code
(which I would support) or introduce your own wrapper (override
ContentDataStore superclass).
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 14:58, Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm digging into error handling around timeouts for a GeoTools
Hi all,
The JavaDoc on this method reminded me of one of the points I wanted to
suggest. If there are multiple methods for counting records, it may be
good to discuss the semantics. If I recall, some of the methods in
GeoTools have the idea that returning a -1 is suitable way to
Hi all,
A colleague noticed that GeoTools is pointing at one version of Eclipse
EMF jars[1] and GeoServer is pointing at another[2].
Anyhow, it appears that version 2.15.0 is available for all the
dependencies GeoTools/GeoServer uses, so I've tossed up PRs to update to
Eclipse EMF versions
Hi all,
Thanks to Jody for merging my PRs. Since the PRs are coordinated, there
may be downstream build failures until there are GeoTools and then GWC
snapshots available on the snapshot repos.
Cheers,
Jim
On 7/3/2020 11:13 AM, Jim Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
As an update, Andrea suggested
Hi all,
I'm helping with the JTS release and GT/GWC/GS upgrade. Ian, sorry that
I didn't see this request until now. We can definitely create a ticket
to track the update. That said, JTS and Jaitools were released to Maven
central today.
As noted in the JTS release notes, there is a
Garnett wrote:
The issue is here https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6637 for
GeoTools.
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 at 16:14, Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm helping with the JTS release and GT/GWC/GS upgrade. Ian, sorry
that I d
Hi all,
I poked at this a little bit today. I managed to find some common
patterns, so I worked across the code base and knocked out a few smaller
modules.
When I tried gt-coverage, I hit issues with JAI using raw Maps. Should
the plan there be to Suppress those readily?
In
o for it.
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 7:20 PM Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
At various times, Jody and I have chatted about having a "CQL
View" in
GeoServer (or something similar akin to the SQL Views) that'd
lev
it's a WPS process - the code is at
https://github.com/ianturton/tablejoin
<https://github.com/ianturton/tablejoin>
It's built around a FilterVisitor that replaces join values with
literals I think.
Ian
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 19:25, Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>
ue, 3 Nov 2020 at 18:19, Jim Hughes <mailto:jhug...@ccri.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
At various times, Jody and I have chatted about having a "CQL
View" in
GeoServer (or something similar akin to the SQL Views) that'd
leverage
the Transform module and allo
Hi all,
At various times, Jody and I have chatted about having a "CQL View" in
GeoServer (or something similar akin to the SQL Views) that'd leverage
the Transform module and allow one to add columns to a FeatureSource
based on expressions. Such expressions could use existing or custom CQL
Title: Message Title
Jim Hughes created an issue
90 matches
Mail list logo