Ha. max_bytes_used is vulnerable to exactly when gc strikes, so I'm
disinclined to get stressed about this. I was mis-reading it as
bytes-allocated. Interestingly it doesn't happen for me.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
Hi Ben,
There has been some confusion here because I accidentally committed a
change to this file that then got reverted. The original fix was #9055,
making it so that on platforms with no registers, globalRegMaybe would
return Nothing (as it should). This wasn't necessary until recently
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expectedhaddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10%
Lower bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 115159039
Upper bound haddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 140749937
Actual
This is also happening on Phabricator, which is causing the buildbot to choke:
https://phabricator.haskell.org/D112#4
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expected
Adding Ben, Roman, Gabi
SImon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Austin Seipp
| Sent: 04 August 2014 12:48
| To: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Cc: Manuel Chakravarty; Geoffrey Mainland
| Subject: I'm going to disable DPH until someone
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 13:08 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expectedhaddock.base(normal) max_bytes_used: 127954488 +/-10%
Lower
On 4 Aug 2014, at 21:47 , Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
Why? Because I'm afraid I just don't have any more patience for DPH,
I'm tired of fixing it, and it takes up a lot of extra time to build,
and time to maintain.
I'm not going to argue against cutting it lose.
So - why are
Hi,
On 4 August 2014 14:52, Sven Panne svenpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have an URL for this FAQ? I can't find it, and I can't remember
what's wrong with --enable-split-objs. :-( What is the impact for
people using large libraries (like OpenGL/OpenGLRaw/...) where you
often use only a small
Yes, plain validate.
Cheers,
Edward
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of 2014-08-04 12:08:31 +0100:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 04.08.2014, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
Yes, on my box, this test is now failing (because the stat is too good):
Expectedhaddock.base(normal)
2014-08-04 14:59 GMT+02:00 Mikhail Glushenkov the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/GHC-7.8-FAQ
Hmmm, this isn't very specific, it just says that there are probably
bugs, but that's true for almost all code. :-) Are there any concrete
issues with
I have patches for DPH that let it work with vector 0.11 as of a few
months ago. I would be happy to submit them via phabricator if that is
agreeable (we have to coordinate with the import of vector 0.11
though...I can instead leave them in a wip branch for Austin to merge as
he sees fit). I am
Mark, Randy,
Sorry for the delayed reply!
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mark Lentczner mark.lentcz...@gmail.com wrote:
Randy Polen, undertook porting the new build of Haskell Platform to Windows.
He did a great job... but as this is first time stepping up to such a big
release, he has some
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Sven Panne svenpa...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-08-04 14:59 GMT+02:00 Mikhail Glushenkov the.dead.shall.r...@gmail.com:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/GHC-7.8-FAQ
Hmmm, this isn't very specific, it just says that there are probably
bugs, but that's true for
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Ben Lippmeier b...@ouroborus.net wrote:
On 4 Aug 2014, at 21:47 , Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
Why? Because I'm afraid I just don't have any more patience for DPH,
I'm tired of fixing it, and it takes up a lot of extra time to build,
and time to
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Geoffrey Mainland mainl...@apeiron.net wrote:
I have patches for DPH that let it work with vector 0.11 as of a few
months ago. I would be happy to submit them via phabricator if that is
agreeable (we have to coordinate with the import of vector 0.11
though...I
Yes, Joachim is dead right. In Haskell (case f x of y - blah) really is
equivalent to (let y = f x in blah).
Herbert, if you think a reminder of this point, in the documentation or user
manual, would be helpful, please suggest what and where.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Simon Peyton Jones simo...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Edward, and core library colleagues,
This came up in our weekly GHC discussion
· Does the Core Libraries Committee have a Trac? Surely, surely
you should, else you’ll lose track of issues.
·
Hi *,
Here's some weekly status updates!
- I'm merging Applicative-Monad today after a few more minor fixes.
OMG YES. This only occurred after fighting off some nasty bugs that
took quite a while to track down. Unfortunately this ate up most of my
time this week.
- I redid the Phabricator
Thanks, Bryan!
On a related note, and to drum up some excitement - we have another
new committer (two in one day): Sergei Trofimovich :]
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
Hey Austin –
It's very helpful and informative to know what you're up to.
19 matches
Mail list logo