John Ericson writes:
> Yes, see
> https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/Plan-for-increased-parallelism-and-more-detailed-intermediate-output
>
> where we (Obsidian) and IOHK have been planning together.
>
> I must saw, I am a bit skeptical about a GSOC being able to take this on
>
ce it's also super useful for
>> prototyping whole-program ghc backends, where one can just read all
>> the CgGuts from the .hi files, and get all codegen-related Core for
>> free.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Cheng
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:32 PM Zubin
in Duggal
mailto:zubin.dug...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is following up on this recent discussion on the list
concerning fat
> interface files:
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2020-October/019324.html
<https://mail.haskell.or
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is following up on this recent discussion on the list concerning fat
> > interface files:
> https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2020-October/019324.html
> >
> > Now that we have been accepted as a GSOC organisation, I think
>
.
Cheers,
Cheng
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:32 PM Zubin Duggal wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is following up on this recent discussion on the list concerning fat
> interface files:
> https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2020-October/019324.html
>
> Now that we have
Hi all,
This is following up on this recent discussion on the list concerning fat
interface files:
https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2020-October/019324.html
Now that we have been accepted as a GSOC organisation, I think
it would be a good project idea for a sufficiently motivated
Hi Ben, sorry about the late response. It looks like you've found
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/10871 which I think
pretty comprehensively discusses the issue as it is. Given the
elapsed time it would probably make sense to reimplement from scratch;
I don't recall this being too
*From:* ghc-devs *On Behalf Of *Moritz
Angermann
*Sent:* 21 October 2020 10:36
*To:* Ben Gamari
*Cc:* Edward Yang (ezy...@cs.stanford.edu) ;
ghc-devs@haskell.org
*Subject:* Re: Fat interface files?
Just to make sure we are aware of all the ongoing efforts. We've been
working on ebedding Core
I found the branch here:
https://github.com/ezyang/ghc/commit/13615ca4e4bf759f323de22a3d182b06c4050f38
On 20/10/20 12:06, Ben Gamari wrote:
Hi Edward,
While chatting with the ghc-ide folks recently I realized that it would
be useful to be able to preserve Core such that compilation can be
all unfoldings, no?
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> *From:* ghc-devs *On Behalf Of *Moritz
> Angermann
> *Sent:* 21 October 2020 10:36
> *To:* Ben Gamari
> *Cc:* Edward Yang (ezy...@cs.stanford.edu) ;
> ghc-devs@haskell.org
> *Subject:* Re: Fat interface files?
&g
On Behalf Of Moritz Angermann
Sent: 21 October 2020 10:36
To: Ben Gamari
Cc: Edward Yang (ezy...@cs.stanford.edu) ;
ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Fat interface files?
Just to make sure we are aware of all the ongoing efforts. We've been working
on ebedding Core into interface files as well
Just to make sure we are aware of all the ongoing efforts. We've been
working on ebedding Core into interface files as well.
Josh has updated the Wiki page here
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/Extensible-Interface-Files.
Cheers,
Moritz
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:06 AM Ben Gamari
Hi Edward,
While chatting with the ghc-ide folks recently I realized that it would
be useful to be able to preserve Core such that compilation can be
restarted (e.g. to be pushed down the bytecode pipeline to evaluate TH
splices).
As I recall this is precisely what you implemented in your "fat
13 matches
Mail list logo
