From: Edsko de Vries [mailto:edskodevr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 July 2013 18:02
To: Simon Peyton-Jones
Cc: Luite Stegeman; Thomas Schilling; ghc-devs@haskell.org; Nicolas Frisby
Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
Ok, sorry all for the delay. Attached is a frontend
. (And I’m rushing towards the POPL
deadline anyway!)
Simon
From: Edsko de Vries [mailto:edskodevr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 July 2013 18:02
To: Simon Peyton-Jones
Cc: Luite Stegeman; Thomas Schilling; ghc-devs@haskell.org; Nicolas Frisby
Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
@haskell.org
*Subject:* Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
** **
Hi Luite,
** **
I was fully planning on a first version of the patch yesterday, but so
far my efforts were thwarted by annoying problems with dynamic libraries
(not -- directly -- related to the patch at all
; Thomas Schilling; ghc-devs@haskell.org
*Subject:* Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
** **
Hi Luite,
** **
I was fully planning on a first version of the patch yesterday, but so far
my efforts were thwarted by annoying problems with dynamic libraries (not
-- directly
through it!
No hurry, just when you are ready.
Simon
From: Edsko de Vries [mailto:edskodevr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 June 2013 09:21
To: Luite Stegeman
Cc: Simon Peyton-Jones; Thomas Schilling; ghc-devs@haskell.org
Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
Hi Luite,
I was fully planning
-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
|
| On 5 June 2013 13:51, Edsko de Vries edskodevr...@gmail.com wrote:
| It is a little bit messy mostly because parts of the AST get lost
| along the
| way: quasi-quotes in the renamer, data type declarations and other
| To: Edsko de Vries
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
|
| On 5 June 2013 13:51, Edsko de Vries edskodevr...@gmail.com wrote:
| It is a little bit messy mostly because parts of the AST get lost
| along the
| way: quasi-quotes in the renamer, data
the GHC API.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org]
| On Behalf Of Thomas Schilling
| Sent: 11 June 2013 12:53
| To: Edsko de Vries
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
|
| On 5
Sounds good, but for some reason we have HscAsm as a target at the moment
in GHCJS, and set it to HscNothing only after typechecking. I forgot why,
might have something to do with TH. Do you have an implementation of this
patch that i can test it with (even if it's not the final API or really
On 5 June 2013 13:51, Edsko de Vries edskodevr...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a little bit messy mostly because parts of the AST get lost along the
way: quasi-quotes in the renamer, data type declarations and other things
during type checking. A more ideal way, but also more time consuming, would
de Vries
| Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Patch/feature proposal: Source plugins
|
| On 5 June 2013 13:51, Edsko de Vries edskodevr...@gmail.com wrote:
| It is a little bit messy mostly because parts of the AST get lost
| along the
| way: quasi-quotes in the renamer, data type
I'd also be very happy with some plugin interface that allows us to use
more GhcMake functionality from the GHC API. For GHCJS we would want to run
our own (STG - JavaScript) code generator on sources that need to be
recompiled instead of letting GHC run its pipeline. Do you think that's
possible
+1. I don't have any comments on the technical issues I'm afraid, but
the more ways we can extend GHC without having to change it directly,
the better.
Cheers,
Simon
On 05/06/13 12:51, Edsko de Vries wrote:
Sorry for the earlier mishap, here's the full email.
Hi all,
The plugin
Hi all,
The plugin mechanism gives access to the program in Core; this suffices for
many but not quite all purposes. Tools that need access to the original AST
can call typecheckModule directly, but of course this requires using the
GHC API directly. Moreover, even when using the GHC API directly
Uh. I'm sorry, I don't know why that email got sent, I was still
writing it. Please ignore it for now, will send the full version later :)
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Edsko de Vries edskodevr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
The plugin mechanism gives access to the program in Core; this
Sorry for the earlier mishap, here's the full email.
Hi all,
The plugin mechanism gives access to the program in Core; this suffices for
many but not quite all purposes. Tools that need access to the original AST
can call typecheckModule directly, but of course this requires using the
GHC API
16 matches
Mail list logo
