On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, David Neary wrote:
78064 Entering large dimensions in Scale Image causes fatal error
Memory issue - some things use lots of memory and crash the
GIMP. Enhancement, marked critical - it's a matter of
pre-calculating how big the new image will use, and warning
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, David Neary wrote:
78064 Entering large dimensions in Scale Image causes fatal error
Memory issue - some things use lots of memory and crash the
GIMP. Enhancement, marked critical - it's a matter of
pre-calculating how big the
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 22:54, David Neary wrote:
Seems like a reasonable metric - but the default tile cache is 32M,
and most people have upwards of 128M RAM these days. Maybe if we
were to use this metric we should consider upping the default
tile cache to at least 64M? If you're loading
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-11-06 at 2355.33 +0100):
In libgphoto2, someone recently implemented reading the available memory
from /proc/meminfo (if available) and act according to that. The code is
at
And for OSes that do not have that, like FreeBSD 4.6? It does not take
into account details like
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:05, David Neary wrote:
Looks kind of plaform-specific... how would you go about doing
that for Solaris, SGI or Windows?
Alternatively, if someone hacks up a plain-C-library called libmem or
similar for figuring out free memory and stuff like that on various
systems, we
On 7 Nov 2002, Lutz Müller wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:05, David Neary wrote:
Looks kind of plaform-specific... how would you go about doing
that for Solaris, SGI or Windows?
Alternatively, if someone hacks up a plain-C-library called libmem or
similar for figuring out free memory and
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, David Neary wrote:
78064 Entering large dimensions in Scale Image causes fatal error
Memory issue - some things use lots of memory and crash the
GIMP. Enhancement, marked critical - it's a matter of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2002-11-06 at 1430.05 -0800):
Regardless, it should only be used to create a suggestion -- the tile
cache size should still be determined by the user.
Yes, cos it still does not cover shared machines, nor machines with
peaks in other tasks, nor disk tweaking, nor is the
David Neary wrote:
Hi all,
10498 Marching Ants die untimely deaths
This has been around for yonks - anyone want to
look at it?
I look at it from time to time -- I keep track of all my beasty bug children.
This depends on GTK1.2 Bug #32617
being fixed (gdk_pointer_grab() Behaves
Differently
