On Friday 25 July 2003 1:36 pm, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-24 at 2031.28 -0300):
The basic idea is that besides the normal addition darken
only layer modes, to implement a custom mode. In it, the user
gets to type a c-like expression of what
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
My idea is that in the end, the custom layer formulas get recorded
in a gimp directory, just like brushes and patterns.
How are they recorded in the XCF file? (I may have missed
that part of the thread.)
So, a set
ofrather itneresting formulas would be shipped with the
A few years ago I took a stab at a color management plug-in for the
Gimp. Unfortunately this
project is at the bottom of my priority list, so I have not updated it
in a long time. If somebody
is looking for ideas, this would be a good place to start:
http://khk.net/color/color_manager.html
I looked a bit around (webpages, irc ..) to see what is done for gimp
help, ecpecially german one. If i'm right, there is nothing and i would
start to write a new one for the gimp 1.3 from scratch.
I cant find
anything related to the gimp-help project at the newer webpage. So, if
someone could
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Miguel Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp launches and initializes
itself.
Carol Spears wrote:
maybe he doesn't have cvs access
That by no means stops anyone from submitting a patch
against 1.3.
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
That gum you like is going to come back in style.
Adam D. Moss wrote:
I agree that it would be wise to point out this explicit exemption
for pdb calls into the GIMP LICENSE file. I'll do this soon if I
don't get beaten to it.
Done, for 1.2 and 1.3. (If anyone disagrees with the specifics,
pull it...)
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 13.07 schrieb Roman Joost:
I cant find anything related to the gimp-help project at the newer
webpage.
You're right. There isn't... :(
So, if someone could point me to a ressource regarding this project it
would be fine.
Ressources:
- This mailinglist (there had been
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Adam D. Moss wrote:
I agree that it would be wise to point out this explicit exemption
for pdb calls into the GIMP LICENSE file. I'll do this soon if I
don't get beaten to it.
Done, for 1.2 and 1.3. (If anyone disagrees with the specifics,
pull it...)
--Adam
can someone
On 26 Jul 2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
Date: 26 Jul 2003 17:03:09 +0200
From: Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gimp Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 13.07 schrieb Roman Joost:
I
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 05:08:00PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
the archives are either completely broken or just severely delayed.
it is the 26 of July and the archive still does not show any messages for
July.
Yeh, you're right. I'll check the other options first (gimp-help-2) and
write my
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Miguel Ibarra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 03:04:12 +0200 (MEST)
From: Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (LONG) Problems with the GIMP (was: Re: [Gimp-developer]
tentative GIMP 2.0 release plans)
Michael Schumacher
i am sitting here, mostly picking my nose, waiting for my ex
room mate to get his shit out of my already crappy enough
apartment without the ferret shit, waiting for email from this
list to distract me with.
this room mate was very rude. he chased my friends away and
drank coffee i made for
Alan Horkan wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
Date: 26 Jul 2003 17:03:09 +0200
From: Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roman Joost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gimp Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 13.07 schrieb
I was just informed that the page I linked to does not have the link to
the actual plug-in. You
can download the plug-in using this link:
http://khk.net/download/gimp-color-manager-0.0.7.tar.gz
(the download link is actually on my Gimp page, which is linked to on
the navigation links left
of
Carol Spears wrote:
can someone explain these license problems in perfectly good
fuzzy american words, complete with adjectives and interjections;
perhaps limited to only 3 conjunctions for me?
1) The GPL doesn't allow a GPL and a not-GPL-compatible code unit
to be intimately linked together.
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Michael Schumacher wrote:
[...]
Thanks. I've succeeded in building GIMP 1.3 on Win32 using these
packages.
Any chance of binaries for testing?
No. There are still to much issues to even think of it - some of them may be
caused by the fact that I'm
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
can someone explain these license problems in perfectly good
fuzzy american words, complete with adjectives and interjections;
perhaps limited to only 3 conjunctions for me?
1) The GPL doesn't allow a GPL and a not-GPL-compatible code unit
to be
Adam D. Moss wrote:
I'm interested, from a project point of view, why many (a good
proportion) of the patches that we get on this mailing list or
in bugzilla from 'external' (non-CVS-account) contributors are
against 1.2.x.
I think there are a few reasons for this. The biggest of them is
that
Carol Spears wrote:
for some reason, i thought that when gnu put the url to the
creative commons page on their site and when the creative
commons put gpl in the list of options, that all the license
problems would go away.
Gosh... no.
stripping everything from the libgimp package and offereing
David Neary wrote:
I think there are a few reasons for this. The biggest of them is
that setting up a gimp 1.3 compile environment [..]
automake, autoconf, libtool, gettext, intltool [..]
(png, jpeg, etc) [..] gtk+ with pangoft2, freetype2, fontconfig
[..]
At least, that's my theory :)
It's a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-26 at 0201.25 -0300):
My idea is that in the end, the custom layer formulas get recorded
in a gimp directory, just like brushes and patterns. So, a set
ofrather itneresting formulas would be shipped with the Gimp (or with
the patch). That would provide alone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2003-07-26 at 0944.01 +0100):
(Well, contrast enhancement would be more like a sigmoid
function -- what you describe here is basically gamma adjustment
for a fixed gamma value.)
And the best of all, there are tools to do all this, no need of typing
formulas. Formulas are
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Carol Spears wrote:
the archives are either completely broken or just
severely delayed.
^
it is the 26 of July and the archive still does not show any messages for
July.
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
try the url
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Carol Spears wrote:
the archives are either completely broken or just
severely delayed.
^
it is the 26 of July and the archive still does not show any messages for
July.
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 16.39 schrieb Carol Spears:
maybe he doesn't have cvs access
Doesn't make sense from three perspectives:
- One doesn't need CVS to develop a patch
- Everyone can get at least anoncvs
- There are frequent releases and other means of getting the source
I think the
On 26-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
I think the problem is that 1.2 is far more used in productive work
because artists and designers are afraid running software which is
stamped alpha or beta more than just occasionally.
Wrong, Im an artist, and I prefer 1.3 over 1.2.
--
Patrick Diablo-D3
Hi,
On Saturday 26 July 2003 8:04 pm, Adam D. Moss wrote:
It's a good theory, being the mysterious reason why
my own patches are made against 1.2.x and then blindly
Ditto here. There's also a common misconception, dating from the early
releases of Gnome 2.0. The first readmes said
Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 00.19 schrieb Patrick McFarland:
Wrong, Im an artist, and I prefer 1.3 over 1.2.
Good for you. I know at least 6 persons who do not. :)
However I'm quite interested in your reasons, would you please elaborate
so I can get some feeling what to tell people when they ask me
On 27-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
Good for you. I know at least 6 persons who do not. :)
However I'm quite interested in your reasons, would you please elaborate
so I can get some feeling what to tell people when they ask me reasons
for using 1.3.
Well, the tabbed dialog boxes, docks, are
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On 26-Jul-2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
I think the problem is that 1.2 is far more used in productive work
because artists and designers are afraid running software which is
stamped alpha or beta more than just occasionally.
Wrong, Im an
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, David Neary wrote:
I have been pretty brutal in chopping a bunch of enhancement
requests today. What's left in the 1.3 milestone is a few bugs
with patches outstanding and about 20 feature requests, most of
whioch are claimed by someone or have patches outstanding.
It
33 matches
Mail list logo
