Hi,
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 21:00, Alan Horkan wrote:
I was playing around in Paint Shop Pro trying to see what it does well and
what caught my interest today was that in seemingly every dialog window
you are able to maximise the window unlike standard dialogs where this
functionality is
On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 11:53 PM, Carol Spears wrote:
[ ... ]
I looked up heuristic it said it meant heuristisch! How can this be
so?
Did you use an English/German dictionary?
Next time use Merriam-Webster Online at www.m-w.com
I thought when i cp'd something i was totally making a copy
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 01:21:05PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Keep in mind that users might be using text sizes larger than the
defaults so static widget layouts are a really bad idea).
In general all GIMP dialogs can be maximized and widgets reflow as you
described.
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:41:28PM +0200, Tino Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW: Would it be possible to get a sparse file by zeroing the unused
bits? Then it would be quite space efficient (at least with some file
systems).
No, there is no way to do that. You will need to copy the file
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 01:20, Alastair Robinson wrote:
Some thought needs to be given to how parasites are going to be stored - I'm
thinking particularly of embedded ICC profiles here (IIRC the TIFF plugin
attaches any encountered profile as a parasite).
ICC profiles shouldn't be
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Phil Harper wrote:
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 14:15:08 +
From: Phil Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs,
like in Paint ShopPro 8
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.)
From: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phil Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Allow Maximise in Dialogs, like in Paint
ShopPro 8
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 20:29:53 +0100 (BST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie ([134.226.81.11]) by
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 21:29, Alan Horkan wrote:
hmmm, yes, it does make you wander if he's ever used the GIMP if he's making
such suggestions...
That was incredibly rude and entirely uncalled for.
Yes, the answer may have been rude but you still did not explain what
dialogs you were
When compiling current cvs on win32, I get:
../../build/win32/compile-resource winsnap.rc winsnap-win32res.o
/bin/sh: ../../build/win32/compile-resource: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [winsnap-win32res.o] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/c/usr/compile/gimp/plug-ins/winsnap'
make:
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 22:51, Michael Schumacher wrote:
When compiling current cvs on win32, I get:
../../build/win32/compile-resource winsnap.rc winsnap-win32res.o
/bin/sh: ../../build/win32/compile-resource: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [winsnap-win32res.o] Error 127
make[1]:
Guys and gals,
Would people please simply think a bit about the tone of their
emails before posting?
It seems that gimp-developer is increasingly perceived as a
hostile, rude, or elitist mailing list, and some small effort
on the part of posters would help to alleviate this enormously.
Making
Michael Schumacher writes:
When compiling current cvs on win32, I get:
../../build/win32/compile-resource winsnap.rc winsnap-win32res.o
/bin/sh: ../../build/win32/compile-resource: No such file or directory
../../build/win32/compile-resource probably *is* there, but what
causes that message
Adam D. Moss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Conversely, it would help if people were also slower to take
offense. :) It's easy to forget that many if not most of
the people here are not native English speakers and might not
be able to easily gauge how antagonistic their posts
consistantly
13 matches
Mail list logo
