Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch to remove deprecated constants from standard scripts

2004-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 18:42, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: Please do that - bugzilla helps us track bugs along with patches and enhancement requests much better than a mailing list does. Done. The patch affects 48 different scripts. It will allow

Re: [Gimp-developer] Changes needed to DB Browser content?

2004-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not sure what the difference is between Script-Fu and the abstract PDB language. DB Browser, IMHO, should allow you to see the names of functions/plug-ins, a list of the arguments that are required, what each argument is for, and the range of

[Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Roman Joost
We're going to make a first release of the gimp-help-2. I want to inform the authors, to have a look over their written content and make sure, that the release will not include major spelling or grammar errors. The freeze of the sources will be on next wednesday the 11th.

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Update

2004-02-03 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Raymond, raymond ostertag wrote: Aside from that, there's lots of stuff happenning outside CVS too... the help team recently did a pre-release of the gimp-help-2 module, and it's looking very good. Roman, Daniel, Raymond, Niklas, Sven and everyone else who is working on the help right now are

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Update

2004-02-03 Thread raymond ostertag
Le mar 03/02/2004 à 11:12, Dave Neary a écrit : Sorry - excuse the omission - I have understood that you were now the main .fr GIMP docs contributor. Merci Julien for les docs en francais. Julien wrote : - french translation of main tools - english and french doc for color tools - english

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Kevin Cozens
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 04:48, Sven Neumann wrote: Well, it is not only used as a menu-path but also as a (short) description. Basically, Script-Fu is a mess. Wouldn't you want to rewrite it? We keep looking for someone who wants to redo Script-Fu for quite a while already. Looking at that

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 04:48, Sven Neumann wrote: Well, it is not only used as a menu-path but also as a (short) description. Basically, Script-Fu is a mess. Wouldn't you want to rewrite it? We keep looking for someone who wants to redo Script-Fu

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
tis 2004-02-03 klockan 11.02 skrev Roman Joost: We're going to make a first release of the gimp-help-2. I want to inform the authors, to have a look over their written content and make sure, that the release will not include major spelling or grammar errors. The freeze of the sources will

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Daniel Rogers
Sven Neumann wrote: All of this would probably be best solved by redoing Script-Fu using a full-featured and actively maintained Scheme implementation. Might I suggest Guile? http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/guile.html It seems almost ready made to be stuck into the gimp. -- Dan

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hey again, Actually I have a few other things to remind everyone. * in src/toolbox/menu.xml the section about GIMP Online is still not translated that much. Not as far as I can see at least. That is translated and updated after I did the move of the object. * src/toolbox/tool-*.xml should

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Tim Mooney
In regard to: Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript...: All of this would probably be best solved by redoing Script-Fu using a full-featured and actively maintained Scheme implementation. Years ago, there was talk of switching to Guile, since that's what the GNU people were

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread pcg
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:30:19PM -0600, Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know any good reasons why Guile would be an inappropriate choice for replacing SIOD? As far as I remember, it was because it adds a rather big dependency, and people thought that gimp should come with at

[Gimp-developer] Re: Win GIMP

2004-02-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
(Cc:ing to the gimp-developer list.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I wanted to add a feature to Windows Version of gimp but I don't know how to get started developing for windows. It seems that the dev site is mainly for the linux person. Or at least the directions. Most of the current

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hi, After discussions on IRC I made the desition to make a bugreport about the problems with Tool Call for the docs. The report is located at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133353 Also I talked to Sven and the others and according to Sven the word freeze is perhaps not well chosen.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Simon Budig
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:30:19PM -0600, Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know any good reasons why Guile would be an inappropriate choice for replacing SIOD? As far as I remember, it was because it adds a rather big dependency, and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Daniel Rogers
Simon Budig wrote: Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:30:19PM -0600, Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know any good reasons why Guile would be an inappropriate choice for replacing SIOD? As far as I remember, it was because it adds a rather big

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Daryl Lee
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:22, Niklas Mattisson wrote: Hey again, ... * src/toolbox/tool-*.xml should change the line Tool Call to something else. This is not correct english and I can't seem to find good translation for the words either. Has anyone considered Tool Menu Navigation? It's a bit

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Michael Natterer
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As far as I remember, it was because it adds a rather big dependency, and people thought that gimp should come with at least one script interpreter on it's own. (These are not my arguments, I just repeat what I think was one of the bigger points back

Re: [Gimp-developer] Misnamed structure element in SFScript structure?

2004-02-03 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree 100% with everything Daniel said. SIOD is unmaintained crap from the stone age. We should ditch it and use guile instead. I think the best approach will be to develop a Script-Fu replacement based on Guile (or another interpreter)

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch to remove deprecated constants from standard scripts

2004-02-03 Thread Kevin Cozens
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 04:49, Sven Neumann wrote: Done. The patch affects 48 different scripts. It will allow for the eventual removal of some code in siod-wrapper.c (for the 2.2 release?). I don't think we want to break backward compatibility so this code will have to stay. The code