On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:02:34AM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't know what I am smoking, but this very compaint has come up
a number of times, and your only reaction is to talk it down.
That is a blatant lie. The reaction to these concerns is that me and
This is the
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 1:02:34, Sven Neumann wrote:
No, it does not at all work surprisingly well. It is *extremely*
slow, it hinders, it flickers, it destroys the selection, it pops up
a window. It feels like an ugly kludge and certainly does not wor
surprisingly well.
I cannot
Hi Marc, Sven.
I don't know if there's a list protocol about this, or maybe it's well
established that peacemakers like myself are pretty much bound to fail, but
I thought I'd give it a shot ...
I've been on the internet for many years, and I've been insulted and flamed
quite a number of times.
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 19:55, Giles wrote:
I don't think the list can afford to lose the input of either one
of you.
Agree. Please find a way to work together, or at least constructively
ignore one another.
Cheers; Leon
--
http://cyberknights.com.au/ Modern tools; traditional
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:02 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 1:02:34, Sven Neumann wrote:
No, it does not at all work surprisingly well. It is *extremely*
slow, it hinders, it flickers, it destroys the selection, it pops up
a window. It feels like an ugly kludge
Giles wrote:
I don't think the list can afford to lose the input of either one of you.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. Compared to flame-fests of the
past, this one is pretty much a yawner. At least they're arguing
about questions of fact.
-- Bill
The one advantage of playing with
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 17:29:52, Jakub Steiner wrote:
I believe you missed the type-ahead functionality:
I know of type-ahead, but it's not an adequate replacement for a real
path+file text entry. This is how I usually browse for files:
http://deeperthought.ena.si/autocompletion.htm (I only
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:16:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 17:29:52, Jakub Steiner wrote:
I believe you missed the type-ahead functionality:
I know of type-ahead, but it's not an adequate replacement for a real
path+file text entry. This is how I usually
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:46:55AM -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
Giles wrote:
I don't think the list can afford to lose the input of either one of you.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. Compared to flame-fests of the
past, this one is pretty much a yawner. At least they're arguing
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:20:44AM -0700, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
completely off-thread, i would like to see the way mr. lehmann has the
menu structure set in his own personal instance of gimp.
I never ever changed the menu structure compared to the cvs/source
releases, and I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
If you mean that I didn't make a separate Perl subhierarchy like
script-fu does (or did), then yes, this I did because I believed
that a user must not be forced to learn the difference between a
C/Script-Fu/python/perl/whatever plug-in. It
Hi,
Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think the list can afford to lose the input of either one of you.
Don't worry. We are just having some fun. At least I hope that Marc
does. I am certainly enjoying it.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
This is the end of reasonable discussion with you again. Too bad you
immediately call other people liars and worse. Couldn'T you simply be
reasonable?
Huh? Is it all over already? That would be a pity.
these concern with Federico and
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:24:46PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think the list can afford to lose the input of either one of you.
Don't worry. We are just having some fun. At least I hope that Marc
does. I am certainly enjoying it.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:48:15PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Huh? Is it all over already? That would be a pity.
I won't let you drga me down to that level of discussion. So when you want
to rant about lies and accusations, feel free to do so without me.
I cannot reproduce
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:28:56PM +0200, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I still believe that making language-specific menus is a disservice to
users. It's only use is for marketing of the language in question (oh,
so it's in script-fu!). But such ideas were and probably are
now that marc and sven have had their fun and we have all been allowed
an example of how the perlized obfiscuates script-foneys with equal yet
different levels of artificial intelligence; are there opinions of ways
to rearrange the Xtns portion of the menu system?
questions i have are these:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
As I told you before: for using the dialogs, it doesn't matter
wether the design is a beauty in itself or wether it is spaghetti
code. What counts is how it works for the user. And the new dialog
is still not up to the level of usefulness
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 0:18:34, Sven Neumann wrote:
So far noone has made a proposal on how such an entry should be
integrated with the current dialog.
What's wrong with the place Inkscape puts it?
--
Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/
All inanimate objects can move just
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So far noone has made a proposal on how such an entry should be
integrated with the current dialog.
What's wrong with the place Inkscape puts it?
The place is probably OK, despite my feeling that it adds clutter. The
real problem though is that an entry only
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:18:25PM -0400, Nathan Summers wrote:
On 6/21/05, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
include a menu entry for each of the gimp script powertools:
the browsers
the consoles
the servers
I see little reason why
Nathan Summers writes:
On 6/21/05, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
different levels of artificial intelligence; are there opinions of ways
to rearrange the Xtns portion of the menu system?
Great topic. Personally I'd love to see the Script-Fu and Python
entries go away, for the same
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:18:34 +0200
(3) Don't try to advertise the old GtkFileSelection dialog as being
the solution that we should revert too.
I didn't. I did advertise the way the old file selection dialog used
it's text entry
hi!
i am new here! i am trying to code in basic a drawing effect. afak this
effect i am looking for, is called inner-bevel !??
i dont know where to start and cant find any source nor tutorials about
how to code such an effect ;-/
so i thought i would contact you and maybe someone of you may
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:38:36PM -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
Nathan Summers writes:
On 6/21/05, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
different levels of artificial intelligence; are there opinions of ways
to rearrange the Xtns portion of the menu system?
Great topic. Personally I'd
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 11:36, Carol Spears wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 05:38:36PM -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
Nathan Summers writes:
Personally I'd love to see the Script-Fu and Python
entries go away, for the same reason as in the Filters menu:
the user shouldn't have to know.
True,
26 matches
Mail list logo
